kwilco

Kennedy is talking dangerous rubbish – here's an explanation of mercury, mercury molecules in compounds, etc... https://www.facebook.com/reel/1677686316215704

this makes flat earthers and conspiracy theorists seem so dismally mundane https://www.facebook.com/share/r/1CGKGjCtq8/

or to put it another way..... https://www.facebook.com/share/v/17khhUnZeZ/

of course flat earters know better than this guy.... https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1DGgoSuByx/

You mean an insomniac, agnostic, dyslexic – lies awake at night wondering if there's a dog.

not juvenile – he's senile.

one of the hallmarks of conspiracy theorists is they have no concept of big numbers..... https://www.facebook.com/share/v/1cxPB76Ssx/

problem is with no education, you don't realise how little you can think.

Before you try and use a flat earth explanation for this, try applying Occam's razor to this...and all the other crap you believe...... https://www.facebook.com/share/r/15Rpt9emhyX/

on what?? - Unlike yourself, I have a good grip on reality – I wouldn't expect you to think otherwise, though, as it is self-explanatory

...and there you have it!

I doubt it, many are the same as he is!

over 13 - ?????????

QED!

This highlights one of the flaws in Thailand's hopeless wildlife management. The tiger is almost certainly displaced by an "alpha male" and has to find new territory – the male tiger's home range is usually 50 to 180 square kilometres. So the males especially need space. As long ago as the 1980s the Thai authorities were advised that for a sustainable population of tigers to exist the habitat was too fragmented – the acreage is in fact there, but it is fragmented, and this needs to be addressed by a series of connecting wildlife corridors – ideally this should extend throughout Laos, Burma and even as far as India.

cognitive dissonance - QED!

no mate, that ain' t true. But it is true that you would think that. Cn you give any examples?

25 incidents and you want to pick one - what you are exhibiting is signs Munchausen syndrome, the urge to connect oneself with major events. This is classic conspiracy theorist as opposed to a genuine analysis of the evidence

The danger isn’t so much believing nonsense; it’s acting on it. Conspiracy theories aren’t harmless entertainment — they have real-world damage attached. A few of the big ones: • They stop people thinking. Conspiracies replace evidence with vibes. Once someone decides “experts lie”, they’ll trust anything that confirms their bias, no matter how irrational. • They undermine public safety. Anti-vax myths, COVID denial, 5G hysteria — people got sick, people died, and infrastructure was attacked. Misinformation spreads faster than medicine. • They erode democratic institutions. If your starting point is “the system is rigged”, then every election is stolen, every court case is corrupt, and only your favourite YouTuber is telling the truth. • They radicalise people. When “the government is lying” turns into “the government is the enemy”, it’s a short hop to extremism, harassment, and violence. (We’ve already seen this globally.) • They destroy trust in science. Decades of research and evidence get tossed aside because someone with poor lighting and a whiteboard says they’ve “done the maths.” • They fracture families and communities. Once someone falls down the rabbit hole, everything becomes a conspiracy — medicine, weather, elections, even relatives. You can’t reason with someone who treats logic as optional. • They make honest debate impossible. You can’t have a rational discussion with a person who thinks disagreement = “you’re a shill”, “you’re brainwashed”, or “AI wrote that”. (Those are not arguments — they’re escape hatches.) • They normalise bad thinking. If people stop understanding the difference between hypothesis, theory, and fact, we’re left with a society that can’t tell evidence from YouTube speculation. … and that’s dangerous.

One of the biggest problems with conspiracy theorists is their inability to understand or handle big numbers or the scale of real-world data. They think they’re the first person in history to notice something, then completely misinterpret it. A classic example is the “ice ages are cyclical, so climate change is natural” line. They never factor in the actual chemistry, the rates of change, or the sheer volume of measurements behind modern climate science. They latch onto one half-understood idea and treat it as proof against thousands of independent lines of evidence. This is the hallmark of someone who doesn’t grasp the maths, the datasets, or the ongoing research. Their “answers” are always frozen in time — a single hypothesis treated as a final conclusion — because they can’t distinguish scientific evidence, which updates, from fixed beliefs, which don’t.

how is that relevant to this thread? Are you trying to say he is incorect?

So - Flat earthers "What single observation or experiment would convince you that the Earth is not flat?"

in this they make no mention of "essential travel only" warnings, just locations – I get the feeling they didn't understand the question, or you didn't ask the right question.

Yes – that is the problem, and the FDCO warning is still in place – Fri 5th December.

The problem is your insurance, not the government.