BangkokReady

It's more disturbing that some posters seem to want others to be doing such a thing. How many posters are "desperately seeking a legal loophole that will allow them to pay for sex with a girl under 18" in this thread?

The thing is, some people have such an issue with older men being with younger women, they'll try to label the guy a paedo, even when the girl is in her twenties.

I would have thought that it would depend if he genuinely paid for her taxi ride home, or gave her "money for a taxi" in the form of one or two thousand baht.

It's an odd thing to try to point out as being a negative. Generally it's easier to find someone your own age than to find someone younger than you. I'm sure most men who come to Thailand in search of a younger partner could easily get one their own age back home. And they could certainly find someone their own age in Thailand easier (or perhaps cheaper) than someone younger. Someone younger is typically viewed as better (for obvious reasons), so it seems counterintuitive to be saying that people would rather have somehtng worse, but are forced to look for something better, as their second choice.

No wonder most Thais have no interest in politics. 🤦‍♂️

Absolutely mad. "We're the antifascists and we're here to attack you and try to stop you from speaking out about political issues!" I think maybe they added the "anti" part in error.

Watch the video. Rogan has already asked him to outline the reasons, so he's right in the middle of that and wants to finish. Rogan agrees with what Trump says and even adds detail to his answers. Rogan could have asked the question again, but he didn't. Fairly normal in a conversation and not indicative of anything.

You might well think that, but you'd be very wrong. "A 5-day course of ivermectin resulted in an earlier clearance of the virus compared to placebo (p = 0.005), thus indicating that early intervention with this agent may limit viral replication within the host. In the 5-day ivermectin group, there was a significant drop in CRP and LDH by day 7, which are indicators of disease severity. It is noteworthy that the viral nucleic acid Ct value (indicator of viral load) dropped significantly compared to the placebo group on day 7 and day 14." https://www.ijidonline.com/article/S1201-9712(20)32506-6/fulltext You're probably going to tell us now how The International Journal of Infectious Diseases is a Nazi publication and should be silenced. 🙄

Where has Rogan said it was a <deleted> show? I didn't even spot that lie. Too many to count, I guess. 🙄 Rogan had a great time on the podcast. He likes talking to Trump and knows he was making history.

Not pedantic at all. You made a blatantly false claim. You could do the reasonable thing and admit you were wrong, but it looks like you're choosing to go the opposite way. Oh, well. I can't make you be honest, but at least everyone can see how your willing to engage with this topic. 🤷‍♂️

The bottom line is that you tried to claim that the Trump podcast interview was "regular numbers on JR Experience", yet, as you can see, it entered the top 10 out of thousands within a couple of days. You could do the decent thing and simply admit that you were wrong.

So you agree that it is exceptional by the standards of the Rogan podcast?

A pretty bold claim. Any evidence to back up claim number four?

Except the view rate is significant, and you know it. 🙄

I'm very much here for a respectful discussion, hence I speak honestly, explain everything in detail, and provide evidence for my claims. How else should we categorise the claims you have made that you refuse to provide evidence for? (Currently three.)

False: "According to Rogan fan website JRE Library, across the podcast's 15-year, more than 2,000-episode-long history, the 10 most watched episodes were between 27 million times and 68 million times on YouTube, so the Trump interview falls just outside that range in its first 24 hours." https://www.newsweek.com/joe-rogans-donald-trump-episode-racks-26-million-views-first-24-hours-1975512 It's now at nearly 33 million, which puts it comfortably within the top 10 most watched Rogan podcasts, within just a couple of days. So many lies, all because it's Donald Trump! 🤦‍♂️

You sound confused again. You're the one trolling.

No revisionism at all. Your tally of unsubstantiated claims in this thread now stands at three. You can change this by providing evidence to support your claims or by retracting them and apologising. It's up to you. As I said, it's hardly surprising that people are calling you a liar, when you are unable to support your claims with any evidence. It's your choice to do this.

Not trolling at all. Really good contributions.

Not strange at all. It's all there in the thread above. Three claims, no evidence. 🤷‍♂️

Keep going. You're making excellent points. You really bring a lot to the debate.

Keep trolling. Lying and trolling, that's all you have at this point... 🙄

Nothing for what? You're lying. That's all there is... 🤷‍♂️

No. I was just pointing out that you are being hypocritical in asking someone to support a claim, given that you have made multiple false claims in this thread.

No, you made a claim, you were asked to support your claim, then you didn't. That puts you at three false claims that you could not support with evidence, in this thread alone! Do keep up! 🤦‍♂️