BangkokReady

Or check CCTV and then fire them.

Anyway, I think I'm done here. It's been interesting, but I've got stuff to do.

Possibly. It's not something I would do or would want to happen to me. But it's still different from an actual attack.

An interesting perspective. I'm not sure that I agree with you. I don't think what Trump has said in this instance could be classed as being an instruction to attack Bragg.

If you can't admit what is in the photo. We cannot discuss the photo. It's as simple as that, I'm afraid.

Let me help you connect the dots. If we are discussing what Trump meant in a previous twitter post, the meaning isn't changed by the actions of someone following the post. Someone sending a threat to Bragg doesn't prove the meaning of what Trump posted on twitter. You're basically saying "See? Someone sent a threat to Bragg. That means that Trump meant X." when it really doesn't.

Sure, it could have happened. It could also be a false-flag. A threat is very different to an actual attack though.

The bat is next to Trump, not Bragg. It certainly isn't next to Bragg's head. I'm not sure that there is much more that we can discuss about an image that you are claiming shows something that it does not.

Another sick joke?

Wrong again. It's being reported as the bat being next to Bragg's head when it clearly isn't. Not at all. I'm simply being accurate. The bat is next to Trump. Trump is next to Bragg. The bat is not next to Bragg's head. You know I can see the picture, right? Why not be honest? I'm not sure that I see the relevance of that to how the picture is being described. It feels like you're trying to defelct.

Any source on the timings there?

Not that it's what I was discussing, but perhaps one of his supporters made for "for a joke".

Do I think that by posting this picture Trump was calling his minions to attack Bragg? No. No. There's simply no reason to believe that Trump is commanding his supporters to attack or kill Bragg. It's silly to suggest so.

I couldn't care less. ????

What is the relevance of that to whether the image is being reported accurately or not?

You think that Trump is suggesting some sort of targeted riot and people will only go after specific political figures?

I think it's extremely important to point out the fact that people seem happy to read an article that says something that isn't true and then repeat that untrue thing. If you don't feel that's worth discussing, up to you. I think it is. I think the press should not be allowed to lie, and I think it's worrying when people repeat a lie as though it is true. It seems like with Trump, the truth goes out the window. Whether you like Trump or hate him, personally I don't think people should lie in the press.

Do you see the bat as being next to Bragg's head? It clearly isn't.

OK then. The bat photo maybe. The riot no.

I was replying to a "silly made-up quote" and we weren't even discussing the bat photo. As I said, read the conversation before making irrelevant comments that make no sense.

The Bat is next to Trump. The bat is not next to Bragg. It certainly isn't next to Bragg's head. ????‍♂️

How would the riot pose a threat to my wide or child?

It's no retreat at all. People are saying the picture shows a bat next to Bragg's head, I'm saying they're lying.

I stated quite clearly that I was replying in kind to another user. Up to you if you want to ignore that or not, but don't expect to make any kind of coherent comment if you do.

So you're saying the bat photo would be a threat to my wife or child, and if they also posted a text discussing a riot somewhere, that would be a threat against my wife or child also?