Jump to content

BangkokReady

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    8,191
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by BangkokReady

  1. It's quite simple. Your analogy failed. As I explained. Who said anything about being ugly? Where did this insult suddenly come from? Interesting. The more you talk the more you expose yourself.
  2. Yes. Made up. Your ad-hom was that I was upset, when there is nothing to support that. Then you tried to make out that I must have been upset for bringing it up here, when I was simply following the topic of discussion. You're making stuff up and "ad-homing" because you have nothing to say.
  3. Not even slightly. You claim that it wouldn't have gone the way it did if it was some 20 year old having sex with a 17 year old girl, but that analogy is incorrect. Therefore your "counter" failed. ????‍♂️
  4. Have you read the article? The witness explains how Biden was involved in the business. Why would anyone do that without someone getting paid?
  5. Well, you're saying that, not me. So I'm not really sure what point you are making. ????‍♂️ If you have to pretend that someone has said something that they haven't said, you don't really have a point. I suspect you have nothing to contribute and simply want to silence people because you don't like what they are saying.
  6. The people involved with Epstein weren't millionaires?!! There's no hyperbole, I'm merely making a proper analogy, rather than changing the circumstances to try to make my point valid, like you are. Because, again, you have nothing to say.
  7. Lol. ???? It's a thread about dating and I replied to what someone said with an observation that related directly to that comment. I didn't just randomly blurt it out because I'm so "affected" by it. You're just making things up in a continued ad-hom. You have nothing to actually say.
  8. Yeah, I think when you move away from collectivism and towards individualism, collective happiness decreases, while individual suffering is reduced. Something like that.
  9. You clearly don't If it was a gang of 20 year old millionaires involved with underaged girls being coerced and flown off to private islands, they still would have gotten into trouble. Similarly, if the girls weren't underage, there wouldn't have been anything to charge anyone with.
  10. What suggests that I am crying about it? Again, bringing up things you don't know anything about. ????
  11. I think it was. Show me otherwise. What??? The problem was underage girls. Why are you referring to something you clearly don't properly understand?
  12. Indeed. People are waking up and noticing that their methods of power-seeking now involve attacking normal regular people who are simply questioning their ethics/motivations. People may be dumb, but they will notice when someone calls them a Nazi simply for expressing their doubt about something or something that concerns them. The far-left types have basically overplayed their hand. The only tactics they have is to shame people and intimidate them, and now that they're turning those tactics on regular people, people are recognising them for what they are. It's technically a positive, because the more they speak, the more they reveal themselves, as they have become so used to being able to say and do whatever they want. (And this is noticeable even in threads like these.)
  13. Sure, right. Joe was involved in the business, spoke in business meetings, but had nothing to do with the business. Pull the other one.
  14. He was being used to promote the business. He was involved in business meetings. There's no way that Joe or Hunter weren't financially compensated for that.
  15. As if it's that simple. ???? Stop trolling. Lol. How? Do you even know what that means?
  16. Did you read the article? It clearly says that Joe Biden phoned into business meetings regularly. There's no way he or Hunter weren't paid for that in some way.
  17. You think nobody paid for VP Joe Biden's involvement in the business? Read the article.
×
×
  • Create New...