BangkokReady

The bottom line is that you tried to claim that the Trump podcast interview was "regular numbers on JR Experience", yet, as you can see, it entered the top 10 out of thousands within a couple of days. You could do the decent thing and simply admit that you were wrong.

So you agree that it is exceptional by the standards of the Rogan podcast?

A pretty bold claim. Any evidence to back up claim number four?

Except the view rate is significant, and you know it. 🙄

I'm very much here for a respectful discussion, hence I speak honestly, explain everything in detail, and provide evidence for my claims. How else should we categorise the claims you have made that you refuse to provide evidence for? (Currently three.)

False: "According to Rogan fan website JRE Library, across the podcast's 15-year, more than 2,000-episode-long history, the 10 most watched episodes were between 27 million times and 68 million times on YouTube, so the Trump interview falls just outside that range in its first 24 hours." https://www.newsweek.com/joe-rogans-donald-trump-episode-racks-26-million-views-first-24-hours-1975512 It's now at nearly 33 million, which puts it comfortably within the top 10 most watched Rogan podcasts, within just a couple of days. So many lies, all because it's Donald Trump! 🤦‍♂️

You sound confused again. You're the one trolling.

No revisionism at all. Your tally of unsubstantiated claims in this thread now stands at three. You can change this by providing evidence to support your claims or by retracting them and apologising. It's up to you. As I said, it's hardly surprising that people are calling you a liar, when you are unable to support your claims with any evidence. It's your choice to do this.

Not trolling at all. Really good contributions.

Not strange at all. It's all there in the thread above. Three claims, no evidence. 🤷‍♂️

Keep going. You're making excellent points. You really bring a lot to the debate.

Keep trolling. Lying and trolling, that's all you have at this point... 🙄

Nothing for what? You're lying. That's all there is... 🤷‍♂️

No. I was just pointing out that you are being hypocritical in asking someone to support a claim, given that you have made multiple false claims in this thread.

No, you made a claim, you were asked to support your claim, then you didn't. That puts you at three false claims that you could not support with evidence, in this thread alone! Do keep up! 🤦‍♂️

You've gone again. Someone else made a claim without providing evidence. Not me. 🙄

Sorry, you've stopped making sense, again... 🙄

Just stop lying... 🤷‍♂️

A risky stance for you to take, given that you have already made multiple claims in this thread that you have not been able to support with evidence.

Once again, you take the "Here's my claim, and it's up to you to prove me wrong" route. That's not how this works. (And you wonder why people are calling you a liar...) Disappointing.

Watch the video. The Independent does not report what happened in the video accurately. Basically, yes, they are lying, as are you. 🤷‍♂️

More lies, of course. 🙄

The same fake news that someone else shared to support their lie... 🤷‍♂️

You should listen to it. It was very engaging and he didn't come across like that at all. Step away from the left-wing media lie-bubble for a while and see how the world actually is...

Covid made people go a bit mad, and the left had just had many months of rioting and looting during the BLM riots, which seemed to have been endorsed by a lot of left-wing political figures and news agencies. No doubt a few right wing people felt that they were entitled to a little bit of very tame rioting.