Jump to content

Yellowtail

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    25,078
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    9

Everything posted by Yellowtail

  1. People supporting murder of innocent people in Israel are a disgrace and should be thoroughly ashamed of themselves. Shame on you !
  2. "Twenty-three of the counts also fail because the checks and ledger entries are not “false.” The checks reflect exactly what happened: Trump paid Cohen the amount specified. The checks have not been tampered with. In New York, a document that contains only true information cannot be “false,” no matter what the defendant has done. The same applies to the twelve ledger entry counts, which accurately record the transactions. Even if the transaction were fraudulent, the entries about it would be true. As for the crime the alleged plot was trying to conceal—well, the prosecution still hasn’t said what it is. The D.A. has suggested three possible crimes involving federal election law, state election law, and federal tax law. But no evidence at the trial shows any of those." https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3007722/trump-trial-verdict-now-law-later/
  3. Nervous and desperate about what? I've said all along that I expect Trump will be convicted.
  4. Or you could just book a table before you get your food.
  5. "First, none of the alleged false items is a “business record” under New York law because all of them were invoiced, paid, and recorded in Trump’s personal accounts, not those of any of his enterprises. No New York court has ever extended the statute to apply to individual making entries in his own personal checking account. Next, there is no evidence that these entries themselves were made with “intent to defraud” anyone. All relate to Trump’s personal accounts, either his checkbook or his revocable trust. Nobody but Trump and his employees would ever see them. It would be absurd and unprecedented to charge an individual with attempting defraud himself." https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3007722/trump-trial-verdict-now-law-later/
  6. "But he’s not charged with corrupting the election. Or conspiracy. What he’s charged with are thirty-four violations of a New York business record-keeping statute. Those counts relate to three categories of records: invoices from Trump lawyer Michael Cohen (eleven counts), checks written by Trump to pay those invoices (eleven counts), and ledger entries recording the transactions (twelve counts). To convict on any of these counts, prosecutors must demonstrate five things: (1) the item was a “business record” (2) of an “enterprise” (3) that is “false,” and (4) made with “intent to defraud” and (5) intent to “conceal” another crime. So what evidence is there?" + https://www.washingtonexaminer.com/opinion/3007722/trump-trial-verdict-now-law-later/
  7. How id calling a NDA a legal expense a false entry. But yeah, misdemeanor.
  8. No, but it was in most all the articles that came out after the accident. And I did qualify it with "I believe".
  9. While there is an armorer, I believe the official protocol calls for everyone that touched the weapon, including the actors, to check the weapon, so I think Baldwin has at least some liability. That a tire specialist is in charge of checking the tires on an airliner does not excuse the pilot from their responsibility to check the tires as well. It is not that difficult to tell blanks from live rounds. Was Baldwin not also claiming (at least for a while) that he did not even pull the trigger, and that it just went off? A young woman is dead, her loved ones deserve to know what happened.
  10. Yeah I thought it was pretty good too, but it took a while to get going.
  11. Likely not Thais putting the towels down at hotel pools.
  12. It is typical for the poorly educated to accuse people they disagree with of being poorly educated.
  13. Frank Snyder was a partner at Lathem & Watkins in Manhatton, had a private practice in Fulton New York, and is currently a Professor of Law at Texas A&M University, and I think he sums it up nicely:
  14. Yeah, the jury gets to decide what the crime is, and even the defense does not know what it is until they come back. Yeat here you are. I do not think Trump is guilty of anything in this case. I do not think Trump had any idea there was a potential campaign finance violation, and I do not think there was a campaign finance violation. regardless of what Cohen pleaded to.
  15. You've been told countless time, quit trolling.
  16. Yep Yes there is. I never made that claim, you are either lying or mistaken But you know all this, you're just a cult-clone doing your groundhog Day Trolling.
  17. Why indeed? Because it would have been a campaign finance violation. It also would not have been reported until after the election. But you know all this, you're just a cult-clone doing your groundhog Day Trolling.
  18. What is it you think Trump is guilty of in this case? Do you think he was aware of any potential campaign finance violation?
×
×
  • Create New...