Yellowtail

I don't think so. Just look at the lefties posing here, the think all this BS is real.

My question was: The President is not supposed to be in charge of the federal government and bureaucracy? Is it your position that the President is or is not supposed to be in charge of the federal government and bureaucracy?

Depends on whether you're pitching or catching...

Are you talking about Biden, Trump, Pence, Clinton, Obama or Clinton?

Another well thought out post from the highly educated left.

The President is not supposed to be in charge of the federal government and bureaucracy?

Again, and I know how complex this must seem, but if I have no idea what claims someone is trying to support, how can I tell if the link they provide supports it?

A leftist (not you) claimed it was a lie that Biden got the guy investigating the company Hunter was on the board of fired. I replied that there was a video of him bragging about it. You are confirming that Biden did get him fired, so I'm not sure what you're on about. To be clear, I assume it was likely just a coincidence that the guy Biden bragged about getting firing was investigating a Ukrainian company that Hunter was on the board of. I think we are in agreement here.

What's with the bogus flippancy charge? And no, he did not answer the question. As is typical, he answered a different question.

I can't quite believe any American when withthe capability of rational analysis, would choose to vote for Trump Biden.

Is there anything Trump is involved in that is not under investigation?

Do you maintain your US driver license? If so, you should have a nice clean record anyway.

Is it your position that Trump is using the campaign funds illegally? Is he not now being "prosecuted" for using his own funds for paying off Stormy when he should have used campaign funds?

Thanks for the paywall tip. If I do not know what someone is claiming are facts, how does getting though a paywall to look at their link going to help? I think Brian was attempting to show that Trump donors were being deceived, I did not see how the articles he linked supported that position.

The bait and troll card, really? The Post article you linked to seemed to indicate Trump needed money for his legal defense, is it your position that Trump does not need money for his legal defense?

I think he means the addresses on the credit report.

Trump needs money for his legal defense. I thought we already agreed on that, no?

So you don't know, that's what I thought. The post was a pay wall.

I don't believe everything Trump says, any more than I believe everything Biden, Obama, or Clinton says. Do you believe everything Biden, Obama, and Clinton says?

What facts are you referring to?

It was your link that confirmed it, not me. Facts are facts. It's how they are presented that varies. The same facts reported differently will be interpreted differently.

Yes, I think they know Trump needs money to defend himself.

And if they have no credit cards or closed them years ago? Again, this only relates to people that have credit cards. Yes, I think anyone with a US credit card should maintain it, but how does a US expat living in Thailand long term that has not had a US credit card for years hurt their US credit score? From your link: "If a rating agency has not updated a credit rating quarterly or annually, then the last credit rating is the valid one. A credit rating does not expire. It's also important to note that rating agencies do not provide investment recommendations." So, if you had a good score when you left, and have changed nothing since, you should have a good score when you return.

And a left bias. The issue is generally not the "facts", but the bias.

Do you think that there are people paying enough attention to donate money that do not know he is being targeted for prosecution?