That's hilarious.
No, what I'm saying is, that an opinion piece is an opinion piece, regardless of what the facts are.
For example, two people can look at the same facts and write two completly different articles. For example, if two people were writing about a 16-year-old child having their penis cut off and an artificial vagina constructed from parts of their colon, one writer might call it "gender affirming care", while the other might call it "genital mutilation".
It's like when CNN calls it redistricting when talking about the left, and gerrymandering when talking about the right.