Yellowtail

Do you have any evidence of that?

What is it you disagree with?

Notice the quotes on the "free" in my post you're responding to, and an earlier post of mine:

My bank (Chase) gives two options, let them do the exchange for free, or let the receiving bank do the exchange $45. I'm guessing the "free" option has to be a minimum amount.

Guys like you crack me up. Tell me how you're going to get a random sample of UK citizens to poll. It's not possible.

And therein lies the rub. How might that be achieved?

Try 6011

I think men like to have indiscriminate sex, and once the stigma or homosexual is removes and as it is promoted on TV and what not you have more of it. Once being gay or trans or whatnot becomes cool, kids want to be gay or trans or whatnot.

That was a good one, but when I heard it, it was "Who's the greatest homerun hitter of all time?" and on the way the dog said: "dang, I forgot about Hank Aaron..."

I think men like to have indiscriminate sex, and once the stigma or homosexual is removes and as it is promoted on TV and what not you have more of it. Once being gay or trans or whatnot becomes cool, kids want to be gay or trans or whatnot.

If the US bank is offering to make a swift transfer to Thailand for free, you can bet they will rape you on the rate.

Clearly some are. At any given point in time, half the population is under the median level of intelligence.

I love the people that go on about the accuracy of polls that use small sample sizes.

Some of that paper thin eletro plated stuff they wrap some coil in rusts pretty quick.

Do you raise cats?

Yes, "...a motley group of fighters with rifles and RPGs really a threat to a heavily militarized and armed nation's survival?" "Please tell me you don't actually think that is possible." Yes, I think with you, and people like that support and applaud Hamas it's possible, and in fact just a matter of time if they are not stopped.

But but but it didn't happen in a vacuum....

Again, how would a written agreement help the OP?

Too vile to read, you poor thing. I hope you found a safe space....

I hope your right about home prices correcting. I view home values in desirable area (and no one seems to share this view) as largely tied to interest rates. I think for a fair percentage of homeowners, it's the only "investment" they have. As the value goes up, and the interest rated is stable or goes down, they refinance. So, in ten years, the house is worth twice what they paid for it, but they have zero equity. The problem comes when the market drops, and they get upside down and dump them. Anyone getting a home loan today has a payment that is 50% more than the same loan amount would have been three years ago, that is not insignificant. It seems like in the US you can default on loan and buy a new car with zero down the same day.

Yeah, it's a joke. What I see as hilarious, is that when I asked you: "So, what were the repercussions the paper discussed?" your response was: It's there in the responses to the various questions. For example, over 50% of respondents think that Brexit is having a negative impact on the economy. I'd call that a pretty serious repercussion (and news)." The correct response was nothing. Abd is it really news that people are blaming Brexit for the bad economy? The article does nothing to show how Brexit is negatively affecting the economy, it only points out what the public's perception is, which they do all they can to influence. So, the paper did not discuss any of the ramifications, nor did it explain how Brexit has negatively affected (for example) the economy. They just used the opportunity to post of a list of bad they want the rest of the public to blame on Brexit. They are using a public opinion poll to drive public opinion for the upcoming election.

That's hilarious, thanks!

So, what were the repercussions the paper discussed?

How would a written agreement help the OP?