Chomper Higgot

Another one of your non sequiturs Jonny Once again I’ll ask you to produce evidence to your claim that I have blamed the rightwing, or indeed rightwing hate mongering for: “Immigrant trafficks and enslaves a child, gets convicted and then lies about the conviction to get a job working with children” Give it your best go.

I think Trump is hoping for a rebound once his ‘I HATE TAYLOR SWIFT’ scream gains traction.

RIP Amber. Didn’t one of the candidates for the Presidency discuss this very specific risk and consequences of pregnant women being denied healthcare as a direct result of the other candidate’s ’victory’ over Rowe v Wade?!

Then you should have no problem at all producing a post by me in which I ‘shill for Huw’. Give it your best go.

Does the Huw Edwards case get a mention in the Saville Report is that you doing a bit of time travel?

Ah, back to your dog whistling.

Shilling for Huw, the pervert I say should be in prison? Do you think you could comply with the forum rules and produce some credible evidence to back it up?

That’s a very serious allegation. Do you think you could comply with the forum rules and produce some credible evidence to back it up?

Perhaps one of those clauses in contracts that people imagine.

Support what Jonny?

No it does. You have stated the BBC were reluctant to let him go. This deserves some evidence to back it up.

I agree his behavior is abhorrent. There may or may not have been these clauses you refer to in his contract, we neither of us know. We do know that dismissing people on the basis of unproven allegations ones with legal risks. The court is the arbiter of guilt, not the BBC.

We now know Edwards is not ‘of the highest character’. I expect the BBC took legal counsel on the matter. Had the BBC dismissed him before the verdict and he had been found innocent, I expect the same perpetual BBC critics would be complaining about the cost of the ensuing legal settlement.

Pensions are held in trust, they are not under the control of the beneficiary and hence not subject to confiscation.

Not normalizing anything Jonny. Perhaps you should consider whether or not the rightwing hate mongering against immigrants plays any part in preventing victims of trafficking seeking help from the police and other authorities.

Particularly if the allegation has been made but a conviction not yet handed down.

It’s not unusual not to sack someone when they are charged with crimes but not yet convicted.

More supposition with zero backing.

Reluctantly suspended, reluctantly let go?

I know that Mokwit. But right wingers claiming the BBC is left wing does not make it so. The Rightwing fixation on the BBC being left wing is not an opinion shared by the majority of the British Public: https://yougov.co.uk/topics/politics/trackers/is-the-bbc-more-favourable-towards-labour-the-left-or-the-conservatives-the-right

A reminder, Edwards is no longer employed by the BBC.

The rightwing would very much prefer the nations tv media, like most of the national newspapers, to be fully under the control of billionaires, many of whom are neither British citizens or residents of the UK.

Do you have his membership details so that we can check this claim of your?

This Sam Melia? ” He was found guilty of: Publishing or distributing material intending to stir up racial hatred. Encouraging or assisting the commission of the offence of racially aggravated criminal damage.” https://www.cps.gov.uk/cps/news/updated-sentence-far-right-organiser-found-guilty-intent-stir-racial-hatred-through

You have my sympathy TBL, it can’t be easy.