Chomper Higgot

But it’s not one day. Try to come to terms with that.

No. When did I say they could?

This ‘white British’ thing and concern over both parents needing to be ‘white British’ has the ring of that ‘blood purity’ fixation of which history provides examples.

I’ve not attacked the messenger. I have criticized his message and provided a reasoned basis for my criticism. My argument doesn’t, for example, rely on statements like ‘your ilk’, I leave such nonsense to you.

That’s a remarkable statement. Let’s see your evidence to back it up. Credible science? Credible medical opinions? Or just ill informed reactionary nonsense?

Now that is what I do call a deflection. The subject article draws conclusions and makes predictions on the basis of obviously bogus graphs and a very dubiously constructed definition of ‘white British’ Matt Goodwin has spent enough time in academia to absolute understand the fact of his arguments, it’s the kind stuff I would expect he would return to a student with a failed grading. The article is an excellent demonstration of an academic ignoring the very basics of academic rigour. More please.

“Puberty blockers are banned in the UK to treat gender dysphoria in under-18s.” https://healthmedia.blog.gov.uk/2024/12/11/puberty-blockers-what-you-need-to-know/

Feeling left out Jonny?

Nobody supports ‘transing the kids’. Its not a thing

As late as 75. I’m more than a bit surprised.

The graph attached to this report tells you the first thing you need to know about the reports basis. Straight lines on graphs arise from one of two reasons. 1. They are drawn between just two points. 2. They have multiple data points that all align perfectly to the straight line. The second is highly unlikely for any ‘real world data’. Two straight intersecting lines on one graph suggests they were both drawn between imaginary points or the universe has thrown up an unbelievable coexistence of two straight lines with perfectly aligned ‘real world data’ The graphs are obviously nonsense. As for the Goodwin’s definition of ‘White British’ being someone who has two ‘white British’ parents. Lets examine a case. Nigel is white British born in Britain of two white British parents. Nigel marries a white German woman, who comes to live with him in England where they have children born in Britain. Does Nigel have to worry that his children are not white British? This from a man who is himself defining families like those of Nigel as not ‘white British’. Next up, not white and thereafter not British. British members of the forum with mixed race children take heed.

How does anyone who has died for their country get to have a say in anything, they’re dead?! Perhaps take time to learn about those gay men and women who did die for their country, here’s just one example: https://www.forcesnews.com/lgbtq/absolute-legends-gay-hero-battle-britain

I’ve got news for you. The people who we now refer to as the ‘gay community’ have always existed, always will. They just don’t have to hide their sexuality like they have had to for generations. You don’t have to put up with them for a whole month, other are here to stay.

Forgive me, all the noise you are making distracted me from the welcome I usually offer brand new members who make their way directly to the news forum to post inflammatory remarks. Welcome anyway, it’s always nice to have at least a possibility of hearing an point of view we’ve not heard before

There’s an awful lot of assumptions in that post only matched by the amount of unsubstantiated allegations.

Were we not told the people of Palestine are being adequately supplied with food and other humanitarian aid? Oh and that ‘bloodshed’ not 26 but 21 people killed, I guess that’s fine and dandy. Here’s an idea let the world’s press in to report directly from Gaza. They can verify what’s going on there by observing it first hand.

Nothing wrong with that. I think the circumstances surrounding all presidential pardons should be subjected to scrutiny. That didn’t age well.

The Rwanda plan convinced 4 immigrants to volunteer to leave, at a cost of over £700,000,000 of tax payer’s money.

The law of the sea doesn’t apply on dry land. Reform are full of easy promises but I do believe them on their intention to leave the ECHR, it would be of great benefit to the people they actually represent and to the detriment of those they pretend to represent.

And yet here Labour are writing up the framework for a law that could have been dealt with at any time in the last 14 years. I wonder if the Tories and Reform will back it?

It’s got more to do with the fact illegal immigrants do not receive benefits. And that despite: “Even if other household members are British, joint claims that include at least one non-British or Irish national are counted as foreign.”

Let’s see if you have anything other than personal attacks to add to the thread: I would be delighted to hear your counter argument to my post:

Are you sure you’re posting on the right page? You seem to be awfully emotional while fantasizing over violence against certain parts of other folk’s anatomy.

You might be right: https://www.cbsnews.com/amp/minnesota/news/minnesota-state-trooper-child-porn-charges/ https://www.bradfordera.com/2025/01/17/merrick-pleads-to-possessing-child-porn/ https://www.wxyz.com/news/border-protection-officer-charged-for-alleged-possession-of-thousands-of-child-porn-images

I wonder why it’s been left to the Labour Government to deal with this: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2025/jun/03/weather-fuller-boats-more-channel-arrivals-home-office