Chomper Higgot

Opinions differ. Meanwhile you confirming you hadn’t watched a speech you were engaged in discussing is a matter of record in the thread.

A very odd thing to say in a thread discussing President Biden’s televised speech. But it it’s at least puts the all your other comments in this thread into their correct context, uninformed off topic nonsense.

Ok watched the speech. A true statesman. Country, the constitution, democracy and freedom first and above personal ambition.

Oh do I never made any such statement. Thank you for admitting you made it up Jonny.

To fair, perhaps someone is concerned there are other Republican gun nuts intent on shooting Trump.

People expressing opinions v people writing a check to show their support, in record numbers. That’s what I like to see.

I don’t have to admit anything you imagine on my behalf Jonny. You’ve claimed I said ‘Biden is a sharp as a tack’, your words, not mine. Now either produce a quote of me making that statement or retract your claim. It’s a simple as that Jonny.

Don’t forget the grass roots led fund raising: https://thehill.com/homenews/campaign/4786610-harris-breaks-fundraising-record/amp/

Here’s what’s predictable and dishonest Jonny. You claim I said something fail to back up your claim when challenged and then engage in sophistry to in an attempt to cover your tracks. Oh and I do support and admire President Biden, he’s done and is doing a great job.

No Jonny, I’m asking you to provide a quote from me stating ‘Biden is as sharp as a tack’. Your claim, now back it up. Once you have done so, we’ll circle back to your post and examine the veracity of everything else you had to say. You made the claim Jonny, now back it up. Or you could retract and admit your claim was untrue.

You mean she’s knocking it out of the political park right now, so want to drag up your issues with race and caste.

But but bit whatabout

Yep back to the misogynistic trope.

I look forward to you producing a quote from me stating ‘Biden is as sharp as a tack’. Once you’ve done that we can circle back to discuss the veracity of the rest of what you say in this post.

Unlike me who turned with credible links to reports of Harris’ own long expressed views on the matter, and the actual legal definitions. All you have is your utter and impermeable ignorance on the subject and a very curious fixation with the racial background of Kamala Harris wedded to a very shaky understanding of the distinction between race and nationality. In your favor, you just can’t stop digging.

Yeh right, and those sources are? Nothing to do with Trump rambling incoherently about wind, wales, batteries, sharks and his close friend Hannibal Lecter?

It a full blown accusation confession. Bang on form.

Said a guy who can’t even make up what name he wants.

You obviously were not paying attention while you were desperately digging the hole you got yourself into, I have underlined the bit you obviously missed, or ignored: Anyhow, good to see you’ve stopped digging.

Produce a diagnosis of the alleged condition and I’ll get back to you.

Because Jonny, Harris is both and can be both. I haven’t disputed she’s of mixed race. Are up to date on the distinction between race and nationality yet, or do you need that explaining too?

Are you now compounding your ignorance of understanding Harris’ race with confusion between race and nationality? Or are you back tracking in an effort to further embarrass yourself? Let me add a bit more highlighting to the text of the law, just so can’t reasonably deny you missed it. The legal definition of Black American: e) Where designation of persons by race, color or national origin is required, the following designations shall be used: (1) Black, not of Hispanic Origin. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.

So you can explain where the hypocrisy is? Give it your best go. The accusation that she slept her way to promotion/power is a classic misogynist trope, I called it out earlier in this thread, you are simply providing variations on a theme. Criticizing Harris for having an affair with a married man is not in and of itself misogyny. That’s the difference.

Comprehension might not be your thing: The legal definition of Black American: e) Where designation of persons by race, color or national origin is required, the following designations shall be used: (1) Black, not of Hispanic Origin. A person having origins in any of the black racial groups of Africa.

Like said earlier ,your ignorance on the matter is impenetrable.