Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    37,306
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. I’m sure you do. I love it when Trump fans run out of arguments and resort to making baseless assumptions about those whose opinion they can’t deal with.
  2. He’s trying to put a positive spin on the news Braverman has hung him out to dry.
  3. There needs to be a medal to recognize this level of stupid amongst serving members of the military.
  4. So Daniels gives sworn testimony on the sexual encounter that Defendant Trump denied took place and that the Prosecution allege was the facts that the Defendant conspired to hide from voters. The Defense are given the opportunity to cross examine and of course Defendant Trump can himself take the stand. What the Defense choose to do is put on a performance for their client.
  5. Is that the same Howard Stern who said: “The oddity in all of this is the people Trump despises most, love him the most,” said Stern on Tuesday. “The people who are voting for Trump, for the most part … He wouldn’t even let them in a f*****g hotel. He’d be disgusted by them.” And: “I don’t hate Donald,” Stern said. “I hate you for voting for him, for not having intelligence.” https://deadline.com/2020/05/howard-stern-donald-trump-despises-maga-supporters-1202933838/
  6. Nah, you were just going all Godwin, while trying to ridicule the people with enough of that education you despise to see through you.
  7. They might have been arrested and they might have been jailed, but the 1st Amendment is very clear that their arrest and incarceration was not ‘rightly so’. What's funny is you constructing an argument in one sentence and then immediately punch holes in it with your very next sentence. You seem at least to accept that the Palestinians have zero control over Hamas, and perhaps you’ll accept that no Palestinian that was either too young to vote in 2006 or not even born at the time is at all responsible, let alone accountable for Hamas.
  8. Trump who already tried to overthrow the result of an election, promises to be a dictator on Day 1 is not ‘tongue in cheeks’ anything. It’s a warning from the would be dictator’s own mouth.
  9. I think it prudent to take statement that Trump will be a Dictator on Day 1 as a warning. Because if he’s still a dictator on Day 2 it’s already too late to do anything about it.
  10. The cross thread posting rule is a very good one. It avoids the kind of behavior you are exhibiting here. Posting a statement out of context of the discussion and the corrections I myself made with links to back them up.
  11. Have you tried posting links to support statements you make, as you make them?
  12. He’s also been pushing ‘replacement conspiracy’ and saying some naughty things about Jews who choose to use their right to vote as they please.
  13. Based on you doing exactly what I said you do. Quote IDF claims as facts.
  14. Yep, blindly swallowing and then repeating IDF claims without even the slightest thought that the IDF, one of the belligerent parties in this war on civilians, have a vested interest in lying.
  15. Perhaps you need to be a bit more transparent with your claims. The IDF say there are 13,000 terrorists. The IDF being the organization currently bombing civilian neighborhoods. What the IDF claim is absolutely not credible evidence, it’s as partisan as it comes.
  16. It was an unsubstantiated claim. Which is why you don’t like having to defend it.
  17. Logic not your thing then. Once a Dictator for a day declares himself to be above the law or annuls the Constitution, who gets to tell him h’es not dictator on Day 2?
  18. Hard to see evidence when reporters are denied access.
  19. So someone in these demonstrations is claiming the Federal Government, and Government agencies are agents of oppression and control and calling for Government institutions to be torn down. Exactly the same kind of garbage Steve Bannon, MAGA, Breitbart and rightwing extremists have been spewing for a decade or more,
  20. I suggest you read the OP, where you’ll find no discussion of the off topic swerve you tried to introduce: Didn't the police move in when students and outsiders smashed their way into the buildings causing destruction, vandalism and rendering the buildings out of use to others? Then read the 1st Amendment where you’ll find free speech is protected, even if it comprises chants of death to America’.
×
×
  • Create New...