Chomper Higgot

Because from where you sit in the political spectrum there is absolutely nothing extremist about placing Government above the role of law.

It’s past time Trump was subjected to a psychologic assessment. Perhaps one of the courts he’s appearing before could order it. The man is very clearly ill.

The rightwing extremists within the Parliamentary Tory Party have spent the past weeks telling anyone who cares to listen that this bill as amended will not work. Yesterday they voted for this bill as amended.

Like neoliberalism worked out just swell, turning those millionaires into billionaires, and the working class into the working poor. The elites you simultaneously despise and support making off like bandits.

Carroll needs to hope she can get an early ruling, there might not be anything left after NY have taken their slice.

I said at the time, Trump could have helped himself by enacting prison reforms while he had the opportunity to do so.

This is Schrödinger's Presidential Immunity. Trump claims it while stating he’ll prosecute Biden when he gets his dictator powers. The reality is, Trump is screaming ‘Trump is above the law’. His mental sickness does not permit any acceptance of him being answerable for his crimes. And take note, he’s not arguing he didn’t commit crimes, he’s arguing he can’t be held accountable under the law. Well Donny, justice is coming.

Privatized profits, socialized costs. What’s not to understand?!

He perhaps wants to hand it to his chums.

I have no idea whatsoever, which is almost certainly as much an idea as you do. The trial is examining Trump’s later defamation of Carroll, which he has continued to do in the court room, while Carroll is on the witness stand giving her testimony, and significantly in earshot of the jury. The jury gets to decide if Trump defamed Carroll, the same jury that have witnessed him do exactly that in the court room. Tell us again how Trump is getting away with it all.

And the lawsuit is for ‘defamation’. Trump defamed Carroll intront of camera within hours of losin the first case. His ranting in court this week is an indication of how things are going.

First to bang on about Biden and first to mention Trump. Back on topic Jonny.

I don’t speak for anyone else but I’m sticking to the topic of discussion, refer top of this thread for a clue. Your repeated attempts at whataboutary are noted.

Each case stands on its own merits, I doubt Jamie Fox, or indeed his Oscar will get a mention before the Appellate Court. Although with the Trump lawyers that stick around long enough to present before the court who knows what kind of whack job nonsense might come up with. Meanwhile, the court ruling stands and Trump continues to run his mouth present more live evidence against him self.

Assuming there are any infringements.

And the court believed her.

There’s a clue at the top of this thread as to why people might be discussing Truss.

Not following the news then.

I think it reasonable to assume Palestinians will start appearing at UK borders in the months to come. The Governments response to that will be interesting. Sunak and the Tories are once again setting the very trap they will later step into.

Got a problem with women standing up for themselves? It seems you do. How about ‘woman gets the better of Trump, again’.

Try Statista: https://www.statista.com/statistics/215630/hourly-earnings-of-all-employees-in-the-us-by-month/

Permission to reuse please.

What alibi? This second case is for Trump’s continued defamation of Carroll, which he did in front of camera hours after losing the first trial.

It started with Trump’s abusive actions and accelerated when he ran his mouth. A matter already settled by the court.

I wonder, could the UK trade Liz Trust with China? Perhaps get a couple of plastic buckets in a fair exchange.