Chomper Higgot

You’ll need to come up with evidence that Starmer broke a law, any law. Durham Police found nothing. Perhaps the Tories could take a break from destroying the economy and engage in a bit of ‘ex post facto‘ law making in order to help you and other out of the conspiracy hole you’ve dug for yourselves. Perhaps you could take a break from conspiracy laced whataboutary. Let’s stick to the facts, the law and the topic of discussion.

The pictures tell you nothing about the law and the rules in place when they were taken. ‘Gaslighting’, nah, stick with irrelevant whataboutary.

Out of date link, Durham police found no wrong doing. You’ve been told that on multiple occasions with links to the Durham Police statement on in the matter, but it passed in one ear and out the other.

It turns out that the CEO of the Submarine Company is no fan of regulations, standards, testing and inspection. I suspect he’s having second thoughts, that is, if he’s still amongst the living. https://www.theguardian.com/world/2023/jun/21/titanic-submersible-documents-reveal-multiple-concerns-raised-over-safety-of-vessel

At least his mouth isn’t incriminating him, or praising America’s adversaries.

And America’s adversaries took advantage of his weakness.

As we see, they simply add another conspiracy to their conspiracy pile.

Well you’ve certainly got me laughing Johnny. Imagine, for example, if a private citizen were charged under the espionage statute, found to be in possession of secret documentation relating to the nation’s nuclear weapons, they get indicted but not immediately locked up pending trial. That Johnny, would be real lenience.

I think Trump, Putin, Xi, Rocket Man, the leaders of crime cartels, any and all of America’s foes would agree with you.

Oh I do hope so.

China’s economy has a bunch of problems, not least the property bubble and a demographic time bomb.

Odd point to raise in a Trump related thread. But we can’t agree on everything. Trump’s only term was a crock.

When I said a few days back that Trump’s ratings would change, the cause I had in mind was the likes of FOX finally being in a position where they see the bigger/better selling news to be Trump’s crimes. It’s now happening.

And yet nothing has changed about Trump, he’s exactly who and what many of us have always said he is. But you make a valid point, moving on from Trump is a thing. The problem is the GOP can’t move on and are increasingly seen as enablers and excusers of his criminality.

The bigger issue is FOX is now backing Trump criminality as being more newsworthy. FOX views are now being treated to Trump’s lies being called out and his criminality bro g openly discussed on their favorite news channel.

Of course it’s unopposed, it’s entirely reasonable on the basis of Trump’s past behavior to place restrictions on what Trump may not say about the case and control his access to evidence and witness names. The point remains, the DOJ application provides evidence of continuing investigations and as yet un-indicted individuals.

Relax it’s over. Let it go.

Which doesn’t address the Prosecutors seeking and obtaining the court protective order for : "information pertaining to ongoing investigations, the disclosure of which could compromise those investigations and identify uncharged individuals." [underline added by me]. In a parallel move the DOJ has slapped down the request by Republicans in Congress to lift the lid on the DOJ investigation. https://thehill.com/regulation/court-battles/4056871-judge-orders-trump-not-to-disclose-evidence-in-documents-case/amp/

Just 7 Tories voted to reject the report’s findings. There we have it, 7 Tory MPs willing to vote in favour of Johnson. Let’s have no more nonsense about Johnson making a comeback anytime soon,

The Tories are playing their last overs and even then they can’t play with a straight bat. An utterly shameful bunch of cowards.

Perhaps trying to avoid being ‘run out’.

No, the inquiry was released tgen it was sent to parliament for parliament to approve. That’s how parliamentary inquiries are processed.

You don’t like there being a parliamentary record censuring your boy Johnson for his serial lying to parliament. I get that, I do.

Serially lying to parliament is not ‘inconsequential’ nor was the vote. We now have on record the names of almost 300 Tories who are not willing to vote to pass judgment on the serial liar Johnson.

I’m not refuting the data, I’m refuting your comment: ” 100% not true. Why do you think they needed to increase the debt ceiling ?” You’ve asked a question, I have responded with an example of why the debt ceiling needed to be increased and another which was totally unnecessary.