Jump to content

Chomper Higgot

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    36,208
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    39

Everything posted by Chomper Higgot

  1. Maybe Border Agents have no business destroying water dumps left for people in a desert. That said, whenever did you want to hear anything that contradicts your views, even when you specifically asked for it?!
  2. After being figuratively told to ‘sling it’ by the Courts and by the Royal Navy it now transpires Priti Patel’s Department are running a ‘taxi service’ for migrants crossing the channel: https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/aug/29/home-office-pays-aeolian-offshore-channel-crossings
  3. Perhaps you are on to something.Does Trump have Graham in mind for the job.
  4. Trump’s ploy has just back fired in spectacular fashion. The Judge has permitted the DOJ to file a 40 page response with the court. The DOJ now has the chance to set out the scope and depth of Trump’s criminality. This will get published. Trump was playing tic-tac-toe while Garland was playing three dimensional chess. Trump is on indictment watch.
  5. All hope is not lost. Or at least, not where he’s going it’s not.
  6. Here you go: https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/us-border-patrol-mexico-water-bottles-video-migrants-kick-over-video-illegals-mexicans-hispanics-a8165591.html
  7. Say about what, his agents destroying water left by people concerned about other human beings dying of thirst in the desert?
  8. What impact? Cheap Labour employed by local businesses, getting your yard work done, staff for a golf course? NYC is responding by providing the means to integrate these new comers, it’s a long time NYC practice. Unlike Texas, scapegoating people who contribute to the Texan economy. Fix the power grid and quit scapegoating people dealing the American Dream.
  9. At least one got shot dead. And that was by no means unjust.
  10. Perhaps those other sentences where too lenient. I’m looking forward to the sentencing of other law breakers who took part in, organized, funded or incited the J6 terrorist attack.
  11. Substantial enough to pull the program off air for a ‘hiatus’ and kick her out. Mind, they need to be careful, she’s a habit of sending people some rather disgusting packages - love lady?!
  12. ‘Lovely wife’? ’Viscous bile you say’, well yes here’s Osbourne’s ‘lovely wife’s’ ‘viscous bile’: https://thehill.com/homenews/media/543503-sharon-obsourne-accused-of-using-racist-homophobic-slurs-on-the-talk/
  13. Attempting to stop the lawful and peaceful transfer of power is a rather serious matter.
  14. I think it’s fairer to say promises were made and expectations were raised. Not everyone was taken in by those promises, or swallowed the proffered easy answers to complex problems. Those making those promises and raising those expectations have failed to deliver, moreover the Government have had twelve years to sort this, they have demonstrably failed. It turns out committing an egregious act of national self harm on the basis of ‘taking back control’ and stopping the ‘hoards’ was also founded on false promises and fairytale expectations. I do get it, I too would be angry over so many broken promises and failed expectations. But I would turn my anger on those who broke their promises and raised false expectations. Turning one’s ire on the very people who warned you at the time you were being lied to seems a very odd response.
  15. Please stop with these repeated attempts to insert your assumptions about my nationality into the discussion. For second time, I am not the topic of discussion. …… Whatever it is the British Government say they are doing, it’s clearly not working.
  16. I’m not sure on what basis you claim they entered France illegally, but regardless if they are just passing through why waste resources detaining them?! I think blaming the French is a distraction, focus on the people who told you they were going to sort this mess out.
  17. Why would the French want to prevent people in transit passing through?
  18. Oh you want to make the topic about me again. Please refer to topic under discussion, it’s at the top of thread.
  19. Your second paragraph contradicts the objection you raised in the first. And trolling about the Guardian is not ‘Back on topic’.
  20. WYDSIWYG What you don’t see is what you get.
  21. I can’t get over what a wonderful year for Justice 2022 is turning out to be.
×
×
  • Create New...