Lacessit

So do I. You obviously haven't got past the missionary position.

Please, not just after I have had lunch.

Only in your mind, which is a generous description.

Anti-fluoridation.

Quite right, I could not possibly afford another Western woman. Having had two avaricious Australian women legally relieve me of half my assets, why would I want to repeat the experience? Are you confident yours won't do the same to you? Yeah right, yours is different.

Until you have tried them, you will continue to wonder.

Given the gist of your conversation thus far, I am wondering how many times you've been in the boxing ring. Without headgear.

If you like rolling a woman in flour, good for you. My GF has a number of other attributes I choose not to disclose, which IMO make her superior to the Western women you apparently idolize. You are just a negative troll, attempting to antagonize. You're the one that is abnormal.

Good. Perhaps you'll think again about posting abject drivel, although I doubt it.

Thanks for the advice, I get plenty of exercise with her as it is.

In the west, maybe. Plenty of 5 feet tall older Thai women in that weight range.

I am intimidated by women who want, and can, take half the assets I have earned, without any assistance from them.

In Australia, I'd probably be piloting a SUV around, looking for a safe place to sleep. Any woman my age there would only be looking to grab half my assets after 1 year of cohabitation, and they would mostly look like beached whales. No such thing as decent women in the west anymore. Here, there's a house in my GF's village, my condo, two cars and two scooters. My GF is 23 years younger than me, starts fretting she's fat if she hits 42 kg. Please explain to me how I am a loser, because I fail to see it.

I remember that phrase, used by a Brit who I used to car pool with. Took it in turns to take our cars into work. He did not have an answer when I asked what why he was settled in Australia, if England was so wonderful. Perhaps this is the reason.

The answer lies in the relative number of layers of clothing Scottish and Thai women wear.

IIRC, the Normans pinched Britain from the Saxons. Who pinched it from the Picts.

You want pictures?

It's the pitch and amplitude. Whining is higher pitch, moaning is lower pitch. Amplitude is the decibel level. Listen to your GF when you are getting it on.

We let you guys off lightly because it's like shooting fish in a barrel. When a nation has 50% of its population still believing in angels........too easy.

I have encountered whinging Poms, and have a couple of friends who are Brits. Like every other nationality, it's a spectrum.

Wales, Scotland, Britain and Northern Ireland all have different accents, ranging from cut glass to broad Glaswegian. IIRC there are about 30 of them. I remember a Latin teacher who came from Northumberland. It took the class about 3 months to understand what the hell he was saying.

I won't be making the same mistake either, thanks for the confirmation of IQ.

The data says an infected person wearing a mask is 70% less likely to communicate COVID. An uninfected person wearing a mask is 30% less likely to acquire COVID. You still had a 70% chance of acquisition, if you were in contact with an infected person who was not wearing a mask. The usual excuse used by anti-maskers is masks cannot possibly filter out a COVID virus measuring 125 nm in diameter. While this is correct, it ignores a problem of projection. How far can you throw a golf ball, and how far can you throw a pea? A virus cannot travel from one person to another without a vehicle, in this case sputum from coughing and sneezing. That is what masks reduce. They are not perfect, an expectation anti-maskers share with anti-vaxxers. I can explain the science to you, I can't understand it for you.

I follow the science, which says masks work in crowds. On a scooter, they are probably useless.

I find it quite comical and sad, when Thais dutifully wear masks on a scooter, while eschewing a helmet. They obviously are never educated in the concept of relative risk.