Jump to content

Bday Prang

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    7,183
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by Bday Prang

  1. Well i would imagine that would be least of Andrews worries
  2. Ok I'll accept what you are saying as I'm sure you have researched the matter, But surely,if arrested, and therefore cautioned in the UK. the caution you are obliged to receive should mention that specifically, It not really fair for them to tell you that you have the right to remain silent, if there are specific circumstances where exercising that right would automatically render you liable to prosecution. It only states that "it may harm your defence....."
  3. in court , not when questioned by the police "you have the right to remain silent" etc etc
  4. I rather suspect that it will, and for all the others involved,
  5. The worst thing anybody can do is to say anything at all to the police, one has a right to remain silent, its the first thing they tell you, and they only tell you that because they are obliged to, Ignore it at your own risk. You cannot be charged with perjury or perverting the course of justice for remaining silent.
  6. I have a strong suspicion that silence will now prevail concerning Epsteins death.
  7. Absolutely correct, is there actually a single person on this planet that believes it was suicide? If there is, I bet they are active on this thread
  8. The libel laws may well have protected Saville, but the BBC could have done a lot more to rein him in, they could have shut down "jim'll fix it " and used any other excuse
  9. Not just high ranking US elites, believe it or not even Steven Hawking's name has been mentioned ...OMG ! https://apnews.com/article/jeffrey-epstein-prince-andrew-bill-clinton-donald-trump-385ccf8d49d337ae4866022877aa9a90
  10. I wasn't really trying to link his crimes to the royals, but I was suggesting that maybe his royal connections were not a disadvantage at the time he was active
  11. The media coverage doesn't help, many people believe what they read in the papers,or online, especially when it suits them. The anonymity which is afforded the victims, is not granted to the accused which inevitably sways peoples opinions, as they really only hear one side of the story, Once people have made up their minds they are generally reluctant to change their opinion. Sir cliff and Kevin Spacey have been fortunate to have been able to clear their names, but there will always be a lot of people who secretly consider them to have "got away with it" How many would be genuinely comfortable employing them as a child minder. On the other hand and somewhat bizarrely Jimmy Saville suffered little damage to his reputation prior to his death, despite numerous allegations being made, why was it that he was able to garner such support , his "charity work" or his connections, which included members of the royal family
  12. Generally I would agree with that , but pedo accusations in particular carry a special stigma , "no smoke without fire" and all that, It would be impossible to remain untarnished to a certain degree, (although Sir Cliff didn't do too badly) The mistake Andrew made was leaving it too late and not keeping it private
  13. I know that but I couldnt be bothered finding links for the lazy disbelieving wokei
  14. I didn't say it was nationwide I did say it was not an isolated case, there are plenty of others, I'm actually not far right , and in this matter at least I'm not far wrong, even though I wish I was. Got stuff to do and people to see now, goodnight
  15. I can't stand him either or Ricky Gervais, for that matter , and I am certainly not trying to be a victim. Although I think it was Sheffield council who banned Chubby Brown from performing in the city due to his subject matter, depriving many who wanted to see him from doing so. Again I don't find him particularly funny and I don't live in Sheffield. I just hate this woke cancel culture and all it stands for
  16. its not my need , the third woke musketeer on this thread raised the issue, comparing Andrews activities to those of Muslim rape gangs in the UK and suggested he should be treated in a similar manner or rather with similar "vigour" by the police I merely highlighted his ignorance by providing details of the actual vigour, or rather the lack of it, considered appropriate by the police at the time. Not my fault if you are uncomfortable with the issues raised . Neither is it unexpected that you would seek to end that discussion. Anyway I've had enough of this I'm going out now
  17. Duh ! of course I don't know exactly what went on , I wasn't there , same with you in regards to Andrew, In fact I learnt more about it in the last 30 minutes finding a few links than I ever knew before.
  18. I have provided the links, its not my version anymore according to your mate I was obliged to under the rules,
  19. As far as I am concerned nothing is off limits when it comes to joking that includes myself too of course,, If you don't like a certain comedians style just don't watch him. But you have no right to tell others what they can and cannot watch. Its never the so called "victims" that get offended, some wokie creature always does it on their behalf
  20. You know as well as I do what went on , why try to dismiss it
  21. one of your woke mates demanded a link, what's your problem?
  22. Those connected to the case directly obviously have their concerns, but honestly to the majority of the public its water off a ducks back after all the scandals we hear on an almost daily basis its hardly worthy of comment. As I said before , even those on this thread clutching their pearls and demanding andrews head on a stick are in the minority. Lets be honest nobody is actively promoting rape or child abuse, and we are not talking about the likes of jimmy saville or Sidney Cooke If an "up for it" sexually mature 17 year old gets a rogering off a prince I certainly am not going to loose any sleep over it. its hardly the end of the world especially when she gets 12 million for it What pisses me off is the fact that those involved in what I agree Is a rather tawdry business are the same people that spend a lot of their time telling us what we should and should not do, lets not forget Andrew is not the only high profile person to get his end away on Epstein's Island
  23. you need more https://socialistworker.co.uk/news/new-book-shows-how-police-failings-helped-cover-up-rotherham-abuse/ I could do this all night
  24. heres a few more for you to dismiss https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-10941619/The-damning-verdict-police-failed-Rotherham-victims.html https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/police-chief-we-ignored-sex-abuse-of-children-hgrhc358v

×
×
  • Create New...