Bday Prang

none of which is relevant to this story

Does it really matter who owns the house, they are an elderly married couple and its theirs the issue is the illegal occupation ! not the usual abysmal standard of journalism, which to be honest is well overdue being the subject of a thread in its own right

Thankfully there is plenty that can be done here provided one has the necessary funds, Simply round up a posse and forcibly throw the trespassers out, It is as simple as that. But try that in the UK. for example and there would be consequences, Its so much simpler here with no politically correct left wing nutters putting the rights of criminals before those of honest people

Even the news these days looks like merely a review of current postings from facebook and the like, Its quite rare to see a full screen picture or video, it always seems to be in mobile phone camera format

If you are away for extended periods why even buy a house at all ?

So if your house gets occupied by "squatters" you simply instruct them to leave, from the UK via your wifes smart phone, and you expect that they will immediately comply? You may consider "Thats' Security" I beg to differ I live in a small village in Issan in a house situated on land surrounded by the wifes extended family, 4 of which are police, no need to invest in security cameras or speakers and seldom even lock the door, Have made several extended trips away over the past 30 years, and never had a single issue I prefer my kind of security, but each to their own

And the program in question hardly demonstrates that it is , Something you would be all too aware of if you had actually watched it. I would have thought that a randomly picked audience giving Sunak a hard time on TV would be right up your street but no apparently not for some reason, How strange, You do realise that they plan to put Starmer under the spot light in exactly the same way,( he certainly won't get an easy time either) and several other party leaders too, all seems quite fair to me, as it probably does to just about everybody except you and a handful of left wing activists The truth is you didn't even watch the show in question did you? You are just jumping on the bandwagon , the sort of behaviour one expects from a sociology undergraduate at one of the lower calibre further education establishments, before they embark on a life funded by benefits Most media sources have their own political biases, lefties like you can read the Guardian or watch Sky or the BBC so why do you object to those with right wing views having a channel that caters for them ? You are not obliged to watch it and probably never have

Remind me please, which broadcaster was it that refused to condemn Hamas as terrorists after the october atrocities, I don't think it was GB news

nah you should try again or better still admit that you are wrong and give up

yes

Nailed it, just the same, and they have a "mafia" too, what a coincidence

I have no idea what that means, But it was a standard part of the curriculum, learning about yeast and the process pf fermentation

What do you mean "you don't believe you said that" are you suggesting I made it up ? Or had you just forgotten? maybe you are smoking too much cannabis

well whatever the process is supposed to be , its common knowledge that it was a total militant lefty audience on that particular show, I watched it and it was actually embarrassing to witness

no mention of testing for rats urine in the op either, and if its only just been tested what were the various government officials shovelling in to their mouths a couple of weeks ago for the benefit of the TV cameras ? I'll bet a months wages it was not the10 years old stuff just something they bought on the way. I'm pretty certain most of this stuff will covertly be mixed in with the more recent crops, we will all end up eating it to one degree or another, good old spuds for me for the foreseeable with a bit of spaghetti now and again

but they don't generally keep it in sacks in rat infested warehouses

Not only that, alcohol has not been the subject of a 100 years long targeted hate campaign , courtesy of the good old USA. even though the propaganda was based on misinformation and at times laughable it has still stuck in the minds of some people (as can readily be seen on this forum. The title of the OP is a bit misleading there are restrictions on alcohol , I believe its not available for sale tomorrow (Buddha day or similar?) That's why the anti cannabis brigade have been a bit quiet today, they are all out stocking up, at least they will be when they have read this if they didn't already know

producing alcohol is hardly rocket science, we did it at school as a chemistry project when we were about 12 years old

Act of god ? certainly not a tragedy by any stretch of the imagination

totally agree and its pretty much all I watch if i'm in the UK. The only thing I find annoying are the token lefties they are obliged to give airtime to in order to appease the woke ofcom regs. listening to them trying to argue that black is white can actually be rather painful and sometimes I actually feel embarrassed for them, that benjamin butterworth character is probably the worst of them all. From the smug smirk on his face its obvious even he does not believe some of the rubbish he comes out with

disagree all you like, but with a 97% conviction rate he is not far short of the mark,

And on the other hand I might not

So alcohol is no problem then ? and having gender issues, (and puberty blockers) literally forced down their throats ? , or men dressed as ugly women reading them stories is just fine i suppose.? And what about unrestricted access to the internet? would you ban smartphones and computers for everybody too? Not to mention adult content on the TV ? or even the evening news? Lets just ban everything for the sake of "the children" What part of "not to be sold to those under 20 years of age " are you having trouble understanding? its not rocket science and seems clear enough to me. But I do agree with keeping kids well away from "progressives" especially the "progressive liberals"

is it necessary to even think about investigating, after a pathetic 547 people complained. Further research into the nature complainers would however explain a lot, many will not have even seen the programme, ever

GB news should be allowed to broadcast without any hindrance at all , If only to compensate for the left wing dribble drip fed to us daily by all the other openly left wing members of the media . Apparently the BBC are trusted to monitor themselves, what could possibly be the result of that ?