mikebike

4 minutes ago, KunMatt said:

 

In case you missed this before:

https://www.njhomelandsecurity.gov/analysis/anarchist-extremists-antifa

Under "domestic terrorism" and "counter terrorism".

So what does that make them?

 

Are you really willing to show us again that you have no understanding of what you are reading on that website?

45 minutes ago, KunMatt said:

A step closer to the inevitable:

https://petitions.whitehouse.gov/petition/formally-recognize-antifa-terrorist-organization-0

I was right from the beginning to condemn all of the hate groups on both sides.

You really aren't doing yourself any favours by posting this link and claiming some sort of vindication. Seems like the wackier the better at We The People...

How 'bout this one:

11. Shut down White House petitions, since they never get a sincere response, few read them & they are ultimately worthless.

Since the White House never actually responds to any petitions in sincerity (like letting the one man whose job it is to oppose marijuana to respond to the marijuana legalization initiative, or having the head of the TSA respond to why we can't de-fund the TSA) we should immediately de-fund and dismantle the White House petition website.

In recent days it has become a mockery with petitions for secession from almost every state, and cities wishing to de-secede in such events.

We ask the administration to admit that this is a mockery of democratic process and immediately dissolve this joke of a website.

Total signatures: 852

17 minutes ago, Jingthing said:

Bizarre conspiracy theory.

Sad.

I think you missed the irony dripping...

1 minute ago, Dagnabbit said:

There are no real racists...

Hahahahaha funniest post I have read today! +1!!

30 minutes ago, maewang99 said:

that's not an explanation.  it's too vague....

exactly what my post ain't... not any more and not any less than it needed to be.

show me why I am wrong.  something remotely logical, and leave the girlie stuff out. there's way too much emotional nonsense.

many Americans... but not Trump.. are Christians... including his base. 

OK, I'll try again. Your stream-of-consciousness writing style and constant flitting from thought to thought make it difficult, if not impossible, to suss out exactly what the point of your post(s) are, making salient responses a trying exercise.

When you only have one border, and its with the USA, it may be a wee bit more surprising the first time the numbers grow so rapidly compared to previously. Has there been a new or inflated conflict to bring about this change in the numbers Canadians are seeing? Did Canada start a new conflict that I was unaware of? No. So other than the regime change south of their border little as changed for Canucks. The current exponential rise of asylum seekers to Canada has little to do with global politics and a lot to do with US politics.

1 minute ago, maewang99 said:

and why am I getting crap as responses. 

Probably because of the quality of your post(s).

10 minutes ago, maximillian said:

Are you aware of the numbers of asylum seekers flocking into Germany, France, England, Austria... ?

I didn't miss any part, was well aware it was the number of a day, not a year.

You are aware that Canada is not in Europe and that this is a new phenomenon there. Or are they not allowed to be surprised by the exponential rise based on their norms?

Corporatocracy.

Although i agree 90% with Noam (not sure about his analysis of the "toughest and most brutal" after seeing the all crying snowflake protesters post Charlottesville), what does your post have to do with Confederate statues?

Well said sir.

7 hours ago, Gary A said:

Where do you find an elected politician who looks out for the little guy? They talk a good story, actually lie and promote populist policies that are expensive and most will never become law. They look after themselves and no one else. The object is to get reelected and to keep their cushy lucrative jobs. 

6 minutes ago, maximillian said:

Didn't I ?

 

>>>The spike in asylum seekers has sparked protests by anti-migrant groups who say Canada is being soft on law-breakers.<<<

 

Some xenophobic comments from TV members above make me shudder.

 

So you equate a group of protesters opinions with that of a "huge country". Obviously, that makes perfect sense.

3 minutes ago, maximillian said:

A huge country is crying about less than 4.000 refugees. We are a truely, lovely christian society.

You didn't read it did you.

Not that I fully agree with him, but boy, what a passionate fella...

"do a sieg heil to me and I'll slap you with your own hand" - love it!

1 hour ago, boomerangutang said:

                   I think slavery was a lesser part of the reason the South rose up against the North.  I spoke with an 80-something yr old American woman the other day, and she opined that the war revolved mostly around economic issues.   Slavery was, among other things, economic in the sense that a slave was property owned by the man of the house (much like a wife and kids are, today).   

 

                    The south had a lot of ag products (cotton, tobacco, etc) and didn't want the North controlling the economics of it.   Yes, slavery was an issue, but even if the South had won (which it almost did), slavery would have been soon abolished, as it was everywhere else in the world, before and soon after the mid 19th century.

 

                       I just watched a special about how the Canadian Maple syrup industry is controlled by a small group of bureaucrats in Quebec.   I didn't think about it until just now, but it's somewhat similar to the situation which fueled the Civil War:    A group of bureaucrats (the North) controlling prices and commerce of products from the southern states. 

 

 

<deleted>? What century are you living in?

I am at a loss for words.

9 hours ago, KunMatt said:

 

No, I just know the truth and where this will all end up. And at the time you cannot hide from the truth anymore I will still believe the same thing and be on the right side of this.

 

You won't.

 

Are you a celestial being? Three-eyed raven? Or just the old tried-n-true crystal ball gazer?

6 hours ago, csabo said:

Right, because you can't logically defend yourself because the poorly thought out comment you made had no relation to mine in any way whatsoever. Go back to what you are good at, being a sheep.

No, because I didn't think it was necessary to spell it out for you twice.

You believe in free speech, great, who the fark doesn't?

Where your Venn crosses Neville's is, obviously, in the appeasement department.

1 minute ago, csabo said:

Sticks and stones.  

I guess you don't understand the meaning of sticks and stones, eh?

Just now, csabo said:

I support free speech so that makes me "of the Neville Chamberlain school"?  Your logic is mesmerizing truly.  Do you even know what you are talking about?  Wait is this John McCain?  Is your tumor acting up?

I'll let Thakkar answer:

Just now, Thakkar said:

Clear thinking requires immediate, unambiguous condemnation of bigoted white Supremacist Nazis.

8 minutes ago, csabo said:

Everyone crying foul but when the Muslims start marching demanding Sharia Law be implemented what should the President do then? Support freedom of religion/speech or condemn it?  Bottom line is talk is talk and it's protected under the Constitution.  Running people over with cars is not.  However when the KKK breaks the law or the liberal protestors rip down a confederate statue in Durham, you enforce it.  I would no more need my President to condemn speech then I would need him to declare morning when the sun comes up every day.  It's overstating the obvious.

So you are of the Neville Chamberlain school... good to know.

1 minute ago, JHolmesJr said:

yeah…lets not let the truth get in the way of a convenient narrative.

 

sheesh…liberals.

Hahahahaha... yeah, that trait ain't limited to one side.

sheesh... weak.

2 minutes ago, Thakkar said:

Good point, JT.

 

The troll succeeded in getting everyone talking about baseball bats and forgetting for a while that this is about mothereffing NAZIS marching shamelessly in an American city in 2017 and then legitimately feeling that THE PRESIDENT has their back!!

 

 

The counter-protesters having weapons is a salient fact here. It is not a 1"x2" softwood placard stick. Not that I fault them, nor do I think they misused them.

Just now, PattayaJames said:

Join in you mean?

Protest.