Jump to content

G Rex

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    697
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by G Rex

  1. 3 hours ago, Thunglom said:

    yes - but...this is a leech......thailand-leech-found-rear-rain-crawling-home-close-up-short-macro-76686060.jpg.3072b1be76dfc4aa74289aba8625ccf0.jpg

     

    Umm  - no it isn't!

    Sorry Mr Attenborough , but leeches do not have tentacles on their head . They also do not have a 'foot' - which slugs have (as does this thing)

    Leeches are molluscs, like snails and slugs , but bear a closer resemblance to worms. They also are more likely to move in a 'looper' fashion , using front and rear suckers. 

    End of lesson.

  2. I had a bit of a rant about a similar experience a few weeks ago. A vendor from HK sent me an item via DHL. They understated the value of the item - and I was fined for their indiscretion.  It is up to me to try to get my money back from them! Fat chance!!

    Anyway - 3 weeks later.   I had issues with the original item purchased , so needed to do further business with this company.  Again - they understated value!  Again they used DHL!!!   OMG - I am a slow learner (but I can only buy this stuff from this vendor) .

    I received an email from DHL , asking me for proof of value (receipt - not invoice). They said that this was needed for customs.valuation in case of 'random inspection'.

    Surprise surprise - my item was inspected by customs in their 'random inspection'.

    So now I have to pay duty,VAT & a fine to customs , and a handling fee & storage fee to DHL

    I let DHL know my displeasure , and contacted the vendor - who will now use Thai special line logistics for future shipments to LOS.

    I have had 5 items sent from various countries to me by DHL this year - every one has been inspected by customs , & additional fees have been payable to DHL in every case - this is hardly 'random inspection' . IMO this is collusion.   I am not that lucky.

    I know Liverpool Lou will have an answer for this , but TBH - I could not give a rats rectum for his thoughts.

    • Like 1
    • Haha 1
  3. It may not be such a crazy idea.  Due to the reduced vascularity (blood supply) of the subcutaneous tissue compared to that of the muscle - the vaccine is likely to remain ‘on site’ for a longer period - giving the immune system a better look at it - and hence mount a good immune response.

    The downside is that subcutaneous injections hurt more than intramuscular injections.

  4. 6 hours ago, webfact said:

    She said the lessons from lockdown were clear - more alcohol bans and more checkpoints meant fewer deaths. 

    She obviously is an advocate for alcohol bans.

    For the last 18 months traffic volumes have been obviously smaller.  Less cars on the road must equate to a reduction in accidents.  Curfews must reduce the number of drunk drivers on the road at night. This is not rocket science - casualty numbers should fall.

     

    'She also noted that when alcohol checkpoints were stopped last year the number of DUI cases rocketed.'

    Alcohol checkpoints were stopped during curfew times - so there should have been less people out and about, and hence less DUIs - makes no sense.

     

    Her deductions are obviously wrong.

    The issues with regard to driver training, vehicle safety and maintenance, drugs, speeding and zero policing must be taken into account here.

    • Like 1
  5. 2 hours ago, TigerandDog said:

    It shouldn't matter what the value was. There is a FREE TRADE agreement between Thailand and China which means there should be NO customs duties of any description if the item was in fact shipped from China. I'm guessing that it wasn't.

    The unit was sent directly from Hong Kong.

×
×
  • Create New...