- Popular Post
-
Posts
6,440 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Content Type
Profiles
Forums
Downloads
Posts posted by Mr Meeseeks
-
-
- Popular Post
8 hours ago, Ketyo said:This professor is right.
The strong democracies that govern by consent (like in Europe and USA) have systems that are so stable that they can tolerate high numbers of cases and unfortunately deaths and keep the economies going.. even at a lower lever... and will come out in a position to recover.
The governments who do NOT govern by consent. The authoritarian ones without proper democracies. Who govern because the leaders keep their boots on the throats of the citizens. And keep their people down. Like China and Thailand, cannot afford many deaths. Or their people would riot. They are so scared because they do not govern with the consent of their people.
The Chinese spokesman last week mocked the USA and said that if China had 90,000 deaths the Chinese would riot and kick the government out, demanding a change to the entire system of government there. He was right.
And that shows the strength of the American and democratic systems and the weaknesses of the Chinese and authoritarian systems where the governments have stolen power from their citizens.
In the end the democracies will come through this with immunity in the population and economies that can be rebuilt quickly. The authoritarian scared regimes who have closed their countries will suffer from fear of opening up their countries, zero immunity in the population and ruined economies that take generations to come back.. long after the control freaks, the generals and communists have been kicked out.
Brilliant post.
- 4
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, Lacessit said:Each to his own, I like women with that honey-brown skin.
There's a German here who obviously had a problem with his racial purity indoctrination. His wife is from Issan, very dark skin. One of the most beautiful faces I have ever seen on a woman.
Darker the berry, sweeter the juice.
- 4
-
On 5/21/2020 at 3:45 AM, Chelseafan said:
Free flights have nothing to do with it. Most airlines offer their personnel discounted/free perks,
If you look at the top-line management team, they are pretty much all ex-military. Inflexible, unable to think outside the box unimiagnative and used to following rules and procedures. They have very little experience of running a business let alone an airline and sadly this formula has been repeated time and time again.
What you need in any well run company is a respected management team who understand market dynamics and competition and are customer foccussed whilst also keeping a tight reign on the purse-strings.
They need to privatise the whole damned operation whilst keeping govermental noses out of the business. It will take years to turn it around but its the airlines best chance of success.
This.
Welcome to Thailand.
-
- Popular Post
- Popular Post
1 hour ago, OneMoreFarang said:Many are active in the usual places...
And I am sure some of them will tell their farang hansom boyfriends that they need support in these difficult times.
Check some of the dating sites, the married ones are appearing already.
Noticed a couple that I know to be with farang husbands who are currently stranded away at work.
- 3
-
25 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:
The Job overseas (rotational work) is ALL about putting family first - that's why we sacrifice ourselves and work away so we can support our family.
Half your life is spent away from your family.
How long can you support yourself standing only on one leg?
- 1
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, richard_smith237 said:
You've failed to recongise the varying situations many are in.
Those who work on ships, rigs, or working a rotation in other industries - some on a 4weeks on weeks off schedule etc - this work is common.
Its impossible to take your family with you when working in such industries.
Your dumbed down over simplification only serves to highlight a myopic perspective, your closing comments just highlight what a tooling troll you are.
If it was so important to be with family they wouldn't be in those jobs in the first place.
I used to do that work and I never had a family nor would I have wanted one because I knew one month I would be in the Seadrill office in Rio in Brazil and next month I would be up in Sakhalin island with Gazprom in minus thirty without windchill.
I have known many fifo workers, mostly rig pigs and I have known many that gave up the work for their families.
Many wives or girlfriends, mostly those based in UK and Aus laid down the law, them or the job...
Again, we have to deal with the choices we make and sometimes you have to put family first if that is what is really important to you.
- 1
-
13 minutes ago, Mattd said:
I am not away from my family, I work in an office here in Thailand and have done for many years thanks!
But on behalf of those that did have to leave their families, perhaps read the previous posts to get the answers.
You are missing the point again and again.
Nobody had to leave.
They made the choice to leave.
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Don Mega said:
what does PR give a foreigner that a non immigrant visa does not ?
The ability to sit on the board of a Thai public company.
Voting rights as a shareholder in a public Thai company etc.
- 1
-
11 minutes ago, Zikomat said:
Thai women love money, but they don’t love for money.
Bingo.
- 1
-
21 minutes ago, Mattd said:
Not in the slightest, do I get annoyed with people who have no thought for others, yep sure do.
You didn't think of your family when you chose to go back to work?
Knowing full well that you may not be able to return to them due to the ongoing crisis?
- 1
-
Just now, BritManToo said:
Even for foreigners only staying for 90 days?
I'd make it mandatory for tourists.
Survival of the fittest.
-
4 minutes ago, Mattd said:
No, I see it completely differently, somebody has to do those jobs, the money isn't even close to what people imagine it to be, it is hard dangerous work, it is essential work.
Sanctimonious much?
- 1
- 1
-
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, traveller101 said:Non-Thais would go through the exact same procedure as Thai Nationals (government mandated quarantine).
So why do they carry a higher risk of spreading Covid-19?????
Please try to explain without resorting to the proverbial thai logic.
Why should the Thai government pay for government mandated quarantine for foreigners that don't pay taxes in the country?
- 2
- 1
- 1
-
2 minutes ago, Mikeasq60 said:
Thats OK its their choice but when the farang husband finds out the money stops and then she can have her Thai boyfriend maybe all to herself whose probably a drunk on thai whiskey and waisted on yaba. And is probably screwing around on the farangs former wife. Thai men will screw around on their wives or girl friends ask the ladies working Nana or Soi Cowboy!
Is that an element of worry I detect in your post?
From the cases of men working offshore that caught their wives screwing around that I am personally aware of, most of them never even dumped their Thai wife or gf, and just pretended it never happened.
Some of the women still continued to do it after being caught and as soon as the mug was away back on the first hitch!
- 1
-
10 minutes ago, bbi1 said:
Those workers choose those jobs and they are making a killing doing it. Life is all about decisions and that's the jobs they choose.
In a nutshell.
-
2 minutes ago, Mattd said:
<deleted> are you going on about, who said that they (or me) are special?
The OP is about those Farangs that are stuck overseas away from their families, some posters seem to think that this is the persons fault, which, in some cases may be true, however, it was pointed out by myself and others that not everybody had a choice, some had to go to work to support their families, whether that be before this all kicked off, or after is irrelevant, for people to state that they should just have popped home before the ban is ridiculous to the extreme.
A lot of people simply have no appreciation of, or simply do not care, how difficult it can be. Selfish springs to mind.
Right now PR cannot enter, my Boss is stuck overseas, he has PR, work permit, the MD of an essential business etc.
Everyone had a choice.
You made the wrong one.
You went to work when it was plainly obvious that there was a high risk that you might not be able to return to Thailand to your family.
- 1
- 2
-
2 minutes ago, Keyser Soze666 said:
I honestly wouldn't. I would just go.
Yep, but there are those that think they should be allowed to stay just because.
Speaking the national language fluently should be a requirement in any country that you wish to stay permanently.
It certainly is for the UK and Australia and you have to take a test to prove it.
Indeed there is a Thai language test for PR here but you can get assistance to translate the questions which I thought was a bit of a cheat.
Interestingly Bill Hienecke the billionaire CEO of Minor Food Group is a Thai citizen and I believe he does not speak Thai... could be wrong on that one but.
- 1
-
5 minutes ago, Mattd said:
The naivety of some people is astounding at times, please think before you write, some are on fixed installations for one, cargo ships can't just pop in to port, offshore vessels are carrying out essential tasks and some cost 100,000 USD per day ++++ to operate, they cannot just stop what they are doing, plus a lot of countries have, like Thailand, stopped seafarers from carrying out crew changes, meaning that those onboard cannot get off as they have no relief joining, there are a huge number of people displaced due to this.
I do hope you all think of that the next time you put fuel in your car, cook, write on your imported computer, watch your imported TV, the list goes on and on, without these guys the world would be in dire straits, the supply line is essential.
These workers are sacrificing a lot so that we can live.
You are not special and neither are they.
Why aren't you getting the joke here?
- 1
-
3 minutes ago, mommysboy said:
Unfortunately, Thailand has little respect for such marriages. This story just highlights the continuous insecurity of such relationships and the problem begins and ends with 'temporary visitor' status, which is an absurdity since marriage and parenthood is quite obviously something that is long term. It's really a human rights issue imo.
There is an easy way to eliminate the hangers on and the ne'er do wells and allow a robust process of residence through marriage or parenthood.
Make it a requirement to speak, read and write fluent Thai.
Mandatory criminal record check for felons and warrants with home country and in Thailand.
Proof of income.
Without those, it would impossible to allow, due to the number of foreigners that would abuse the system.
After all, who wouldn't learn Thai to remain with their wife or kids?
Never going to happen though as the root cause is a fear and distrust of foreigners in particular Westerners.
-
3 minutes ago, Keyser Soze666 said:
Ironically, I wouldn't mind being 'stuck' outside now. Cooler climate, a chance to re-valuate things without distractions, missus not in my ear, proper food available, etc. But that's just me.
Re-evaluating is what every foreigner should be doing now, especially those stuck outside the country.
Think about what you are doing.
Assess the risks going forward.
- 1
-
1 minute ago, Darksidedude said:
A lot of people work rotational work in other county's especially oil workers like myself fly in fly out month on month off or whatever, people who were due to fly into Thailand for their R & R back to their family's cannot get back in, there are also many folk on retirement visas they may have had to go back to their home country's for business reasons or visa reasons, i can only get a spouse visa outside of Thailand, think before you speak man.
Again back to recognising your status.
None of that matters.
-
- Popular Post
5 minutes ago, Darksidedude said:Yes its horrible i believe they should allow falangs who are married to Thais return.
I think its disgraceful how falangs that have family's in Thailand are treated we have no rights what so ever apart from getting a spouse visa, whats the issue falangs go to Thailand self isolate for 14 days done
The best way to combat this would be for us all to petition our home countries for reciprocal laws.
The Thais will never even think about changing it otherwise until it affects them in the pocket.
- 3
-
- Popular Post
1 minute ago, Odysseus123 said:I couldn't put it any better than that.
Perfectly apparent every day in my 10 years in Thailand.
Once understood you immediately stop the silly 'I am better expat than thou' competition nonsense and realise that a pink book, green book, ownership of any property, marriage, kids etc doesn't mean squat.
Ironically I am a permanent resident and director of a Thai Public Ltd. company and if I was outside the country I would be in exactly the same boat.
In the end we are all foreigners and 'farang' to Thais and that is all we ever will be.
Doesn't mean I agree with it but that is the way it is.
- 3
- 1
-
- Popular Post
Their first mistake was thinking that Thailand recognises them as special cases through marriage, children with a Thai spouse, retirees or any other method that they have been using to cling on to a life in a country that does not value or want them.
A harsh wake up call to be sure, but better late than never.
Their second mistake was not fully understanding their status and rights as temporary visitors for purposes other than tourism.
They are not residents, they are not immigrants, they have not emigrated to Thailand, they do not live here permanently, and most importantly, they do not have a right to return.
- 5
- 1
SURVEY: Should Foreigners separated from family be allowed to return?
in Thailand News
Posted
Absolutely not.
The low case numbers and deaths show that a total travel ban on foreign arrivals works.