Jump to content

Danderman123

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    17,712
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    16

Everything posted by Danderman123

  1. Water vapor indeed is a major greenhouse gas. Water vapor levels in the atmosphere are largely governed by temperature- the higher the temperature, the more water vapor that can be carried in the atmosphere. This creates a feedback loop which increases temperature even more. So, there is a direct correlation between CO2 levels and Water vapor.
  2. Why would anyone negotiate with Putin, if Putin can be so easily provoked into shooting off nukes?
  3. https://www.rollingstone.com/politics/politics-features/lordstown-auto-plant-trump-broken-promises-1073686/ Broken Promises: How Trump Betrayed the Autoworkers of Youngstown, Ohio Trump made a pledge to the workers of the Lordstown plant that he could save their jobs and their city. Instead, the massive auto plant shuttered and 4,500 were left unemployed.
  4. If you support a 4 time indicted idiot for president, you are going to be very disappointed in the near future.
  5. In your mind. You've been yammering about this, but have failed to provide any evidence.
  6. There is an experiment that has been performed millions of times that could be useful here. If what is known as a virus is really just cell fragments of a host body, then the DNA in those cell fragments should be identical to the DNA of the host body. Testing the DNA of the fragments, however, reveals that the fragment DNA is different from the host body, but identical to the DNA of the fragments of another COVID patient. It happens that the DNA of cell fragments from people suffering from Covid around the world is more or less identical, with minor modifications. Conversely, healthy people generally do not show any such cell fragments at all. Therefore, some sort of foreign entity is present in Covid patients. This entity is the Covid virus, but you can call it something else, if it makes you happy.
  7. So far, it looks like these vials of "vaccine" that were examined and determined to have DNA in them, seem pretty dodgy. For a scientist to base any findings on something mailed to them anonymously is pretty crazy, IMHO. Who knows what was in those vials? This is a nothingburger.
  8. The corollary is not to base your opinion on findings that are not yet peer reviewed.
  9. My experience is with bargirls. 90% have Thai boyfriends. If they have hooked a Farang, they may still keep their Thai boyfriend on the side. Of the remaining 10%, some go with Tomboys, the rest are asexual (mostly due to overload from working abroad). So, for bargirls, by far their preference is Thai. Customers and sponsors are only acceptable as far as they have cash.
  10. I don't know, because the initial reports indicate some problem with testing methology. It's kind of like the initial reports of Mexican aliens. Until the initial analysis is repeated by other scientists, using scientific methods, it's just an anecdote.
  11. Lips Lounge in Jomtien is for sale.
  12. I am sure this is all a misunderstanding, and there will be no charges lodged against anyone.
  13. no published papers, just internet accounts of their research. No peer review. How did they say they got their samples? "I know a guy".
  14. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=4449686 Not so good for Sweden.
  15. The provenance of the vaccine being tested is critical.
  16. And again, the provenance of the samples is suspect. Not just suspect, but also, the findings only relate to that source. That's what happens when your description of the source of your samples starts off with "I know a guy......"
  17. The Republicans plan to encourage their voters to use mail in ballots in 2024.
  18. The question remains about the origins of the samples used. These findings need to be duplicated by other scientists.
  19. Here is the problem with anti-vaxxers and Covid Deniers (they use the same tactics): Reliance on a single, unconfirmed scientific study; Taking scientific conclusions out of context; Relying on random remarks by a scientist; Reliance on low quality clinical studies (small sample size, non-random patient selection, etc). If you are going to rely on a single unconfirmed report, then I have some Mexican aliens for you.
  20. Which vaccine did you have? How long did the symptoms persist?
  21. You're always good for a misinformation post. https://health.ucdavis.edu/news/headlines/some-80-of-patients-hospitalized-with-covid-are-unvaccinated/2022/10 Some 80% of patients hospitalized with COVID are unvaccinated
  22. No. Infected vaccinated people are less likely to infect others, and are infectious for a shorter period than the unvaccinated. BTW, the Covid vaccine did not exist 2.75 years ago, IIRC.
  23. In a country where a large percent of people are vaccinated, of course they will show up in hospitals in greater absolute numbers than the unvaccinated. Conversely, vaccinated people are admitted to hospitals in lower numbers - relatively, compared to the unvaccinated. Your inability to distinguish between absolute and relative numbers makes to susceptible to misinformation from your internet friends.
  24. Except that Covid is real, a million people died from it in the US, and people who are fully vaccinated are much less likely to be infected.
×
×
  • Create New...