Liverpool Lou

Why do you say that? No one lost anything, the woman did not confirm her order nor pay for the tickets.

Where was it stated that the vendor was a "fake"?

You just need to read the article in full, all the details that you need are there.

Looks like a strong case Looks as though it's a strong case for the vendor as they buyers didn't confirm their order and were not contactable and the numbers were sold to others!

Can't you read? He specifically stated that he was not generalising and he did specify the words that were used that confirm the racist verbal attack of the group involved.

He very clearly specified the reason he was upset by the treatment and the the words he received,

The OP does not state that will be the case, it specifically states that only income from employment or assets may be liable.

Why? Where has it been stated that banks are going to be deducting tax at source? Which part of your visa terms gives tax advice?

How would the banks know whether tax was due when it only applies to income from employment or from assets and some people would be below the tax threshold?

Bolt thugs, in a car. The report did not state that it was a normal metered taxi that turned up.

Perhaps the white car that is shown behind the taxi is the Bolt car. Perhaps the taxi driver is also a driver for Bolt? Perhaps what is in the photo really doesn't matter.

The bank apps in question (in the OP) were fine, no security issues at all. The problem was that the woman thought it was fine to transfer all her money to one account on the word of a total stranger and then provide that stranger with the ability to drain the account using the passcode that she voluntarily provided.

Never, ever, take financial recommendations from anyone who uses the phrase "It's so cool, man"!

Your personal observations are a contradiction. You don't think anyone is turned on by that interest yet you confirm that it is titillating...which one are you going for?

You mean that "you do not", surely?

Nowhere in that link does it confirm the specifics of your claim.

Thanks. But that's another topic, and has nothing to do with my question. It's another topic and it is also nonsense.

Under which regulation do tourists have to do that?

Maybe the drivers age (79) was a factor.

No, it is not.

Why?

Until you're a Mod, don't tell any other members how, where or what to post. It would help if you bear in mind the context of the several UK mail service comments relating to UK banking that have been made, not only by me.

Why? Are you prone to giving out your banking app passcodes to anyone who asks so that your accounts can be emptied?

Poorest reading ever! Did you ever hear about reading the full story?

BINGO, postal delivery in Thailand is generally very good, why oh why we have these idiots posting about their slack delivery expecting EVERYONE to enjoy the same service is quite frankly ridiculous, they don't know Thailand.