Liverpool Lou

Yes, and yes.

No point to argue with you You're right based on the "argument" you've got!

No need to waste my time Just check your posts I don't need to, I am not the one accusing me of being a Thai apologist. Why don't you check my posts if you're so confident of your assertion? If you're so concerned about "wasting your time" why did you start the "apologist" interaction with me with something that you cannot back up?

https://www.thailandnews.co/2011/08/thaksin-never-wanted-by-interpol/ What? Why the link to an article confirming that Interpol never issued a Notice for him? My question was, "Do you have any evidence of any country that has stated specifically that they do not recognise his criminal convictions?" That link does not provide the name of any such country.

Really! You really believe that? Go on, then, which was the "trumped up" charge?

You can fool some of the people some of the time but Liverpool Lou all of the time (it seems) ???? You wish.

Take your pick I was pretty sure that you wouldn't be able to and I was right. if it is so little of a challenge, why don't you pick one?

How? Expand Spoiler alert: They are murdering and plundering their neighbors country. Spoiler alert...this Russian isn't and she is not responsible for her countries action so why should she be the subject of anyone's disparagement?

How? And I mean as opposed to his just arriving in the UK, what was so special ("open arms") about what you call a welcome from the UK authorities?

And the restart of the typical Thai apologist again Show me one example of my being a "Thai apologist" as opposed to advocating fairness and lack of bias.

my wife has a son from a previous marriage..he was 3 when we met he is now 11 ..I also have a son with his mother ..these 2 brothers are as close as any one can be both my son's..as I've always been dad to both ..total incorrect what you said perhaps you have had a bad experience.. if so I'm sorry I'm just stating my relationship.. You need to read the comment to which I responded properly, I made no reference to my having "a bad experience".

Rationality has no bearing on relationships. We are creatures ruled by emotions, not being Vulcans. Quite right, but, then, my comment was not referring to relationships! Rationality should have a huge bearing on what is posted in a forum for rational discussion.

So you inferring that because ....... nah I give up, No, I wasn't inferring anything, my comment was factual.

Yes, there's only hundreds of thousands of them with m/c licences..

It did pay up because, unsurprisingly, legitimate, non-voided claims are always paid by insurers.

She was fully insured.

Because The Sun pays for such reports.

There is no bill to pay, her insurer covered that.

Her insurer paid all her claims.

Bashing Thais OR bashing the Thai police? If its the second then I agree, they are going to get bashed in every thread about them. "Bashing Thais OR bashing the Thai police?" There's no difference. Thai police are Thais. "... they are going to get bashed in every thread about them". That doesn't mean that it's anything but an irrational, bad trait. "Bashing" anything is nothing to be proud or smug about.

They'll get more attention than the farang. Thais tend to dote on sons. So nothing rational, then? Anecdotal, isolated incidences don't mean anything in the context of wildly general assertions.

How to fix a hole in a brick wall Polyfilla.

"what can be done to alleviate the pain that I am in presently please?" Tylenol or Arcoxia and stop doing what you know is causing your problem so that you don't have to take Tylenol or Arcoxia.

Have you thought to asked the airline?

Why? Rationally.