Liverpool Lou

You need to read the article properly, the Thai was "Gold" also...that was his point!

So funny. You bit. Even funnier that you lamely assume that I'm a Scouser...are you from the jungle, In The Jungle?

Why are you addressing your "Scouser" remark to me?

You're right, just six soft cuties.

They don't know that, they can't read very well.

"also how can you be a 'rebel' or an 'outlaw'"...when eveyone's pissing themselves laughing at them?

Nuff said. Chapter? Hardly enough to make a sentence.

...but they do have to be able to stand, legs a-kimbo, with their arms firmly crossed across their chests and a serious scowl on their faces in a lame attempt to intimidate anyone who gives a fck!

I don't disagree with that, what I find strange is how a three-month old car with 1500km on the clock (and no photos) can really be as "corroded" as the OP claims. And, if it is, why wouldn't the dealer have it rectified under the warranty that would cost him nothing to do and be good PR?

So why no photos yet of all this "corrosion"?

It is used now, three months and 1500km used.

After three months and 1500km driving in Thailand's dry season how can it really be that bad?

With Thailand's defamation laws, if Mazda really doesn't think that the OP has a case, they'll let him do that!

Yeah I don't know why on that subject, thats why I did not comment. Kerbed?

You need to explain that in more detail. The dealer has no reason to deny a genuine warranty claim because he wouldn't be paying for it, Mazda would be.

He did get free insurance, as he stated in the OP.

...as can the label on the seatbelts near the bottom mounting bolt.

Surface rust that all unprotected steel gets or corrosion holes on the "carrying Iron" (what is that, do you mean suspension parts?)?

You're not a lawyer, are you?!

That's not how car finance here in Thailand works. Car finance here in Thailand is "hire purchase", the bank/finance company is the owner of the vehicle, and you rent it from them. After a few years of paying rent they transfer the ownership to you. "That's not how car finance here in Thailand works." Yes, it is. ...the bank/finance company is the owner of the vehicle..." I know, that's why I deliberately put "owner" in quotes. "...and you rent it from them". The financed car buyer does not rent the car from the finance company, he pays the finance installments. "After a few years of paying rent they transfer the ownership to you". After all the finance is paid off, ownership is transferred, there's no "renting"!

That’s what it says. Learn to read. I can read. You need to be able to understand the point of the emphasis that I indicated on the first word ("You're") in my comment.

Exactly as it should have been, that's a guarantors only job and she would have been aware of the risk she was taking. Didn't her father claim for the lost bike on the insurance or did his lending it out void the cover?

Probably wouldn't get them an advantage if it was shown in court that they did that just to renege on the debt.

The bank wouldn't do that unless it had exhausted all possibilities of repayment from the guarantors first.

No one is "making a family homeless", the guarantors willingly agreed to put themselves in the position of clearing the debt.