Jump to content

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    26,595
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Liverpool Lou

  1. You really think that the contents of small safes, worked on in the thief's own time, could not be accessed without a key?
  2. Why? B170,000 doesn't need a big safe, the smallest available would be more than big enough.
  3. You think that detailing pickpocketing instructions would be a good thing? No one needs to know the specifics of skilled theft, they just need to know to keep an eye (and a hand) on their own valuables and be suspicious of being crowded.
  4. Asean Now seems to be a very odd place to post a pleading video addressed to Thais...in English!
  5. I don’t owe you any information, your education in the matter is your own responsibility. I didn't suggest that you do!
  6. I didn’t say they have, I said they will; try reading posts properly before jumping at people. You're correct, I misread, I apologise. Having said that, "The Republicans" will not be banning abortion, books or drag artists, try quoting facts properly before jumping at the keyboard.
  7. "From" prices to Pattaya, Silom and Sukhumvit are quoted on their homepage (to Silom from B1400 for a Camry) and specific prices are quoted if a call is made to the call centre with the journey's details.
  8. Did you also know that: "under federal law, an individual who possesses an Enhanced Handgun Carry Permit issued by the State of Tennessee would be permitted to possess a firearm in a school zone located in Tennessee. Additionally, under the Gun-Free School Zones Act, a person without a license issued by the state in which the school zone is located who is not otherwise prohibited from possessing a firearm may possess a firearm in a school zone so long as the firearm is unloaded and either locked in a container or locked in a firearm rack inside a vehicle, similar to the Tennessee State law exception." https://www.uslawshield.com/tennessee-gun-law/ Yes, I did, I can read just as well as you can and that law does not relate to the circumstances of this school incident. Did your quoting that have any point relevant to my comments?
  9. Don't flatter yourself that you could ever provide all the information that I need!
  10. It’s a short step from a public area into a school. Well done. I know that.
  11. Republicans have not "banned abortions", neither have they "banned books", nor "banned drag artists".
  12. Licencing of guns wasn't my argument. Are you saying that firearms are permitted, legally, in Tennessee's schools? They're not.
  13. Logically, that applies to handguns also.
  14. Who are you to demand what another person's (maybe) first published comment should be when your first comment here was to have a go at her? According to your rules, your post should have been "to condemn the killer and offer condolences for the victims and families"?
  15. It was actually a woman using and controlling guns that killed, not the guns. You're illogical argument, however, would have been more accurate if you posted that "it was bullets that killed people", not "the sex", nor "the guns"!
  16. Not a man, a woman, a woman who thought that she was a man. "A police spokesperson later told ABC News the shooter was assigned female at birth but pointed to a social media account linked to the shooter that included the use of the pronouns he/him".
  17. Just as obscene is MTG blaming Biden for it................ Marjorie Taylor Greene blames Biden and other 'gun grabbers' for Nashville school shooting She actually blamed the "gun-free laws", that he hypocritically supported, that ensure school children have no such protection while Biden does have that protection afforded by guns.
  18. Or, "more victims killed with a handgun" which would be just as accurate based on what has been reported so far on this thread..
  19. I'm keeping track of all the violent incidents and mysterious deaths involving alcohol. Oh, right, good for you. You're aware of them all and the specifics of the intoxication, then, are you?
  20. Some posters need to read the actual report in the link, not just the OP's different version of it.
  21. And none of the tourists in this incident have been confirmed as being Muslims according to the original report in the OP link, only, possibly, two of the staff who were involved.
  22. Looks as though the "News Team" and most of the posters here have got it wrong, the link that is provided in the OP clearly states that the Jordanian , Egyptian and the third unknown nationality were employees of the restaurant, the nationalities of the intoxicated tourists were unknown.... "Three foreigners who were Mr. MOHAMMAD JEHAD, Jordanian, MOHAMMAD ALOMARI, an Egyptian, and Mr. WAI LU SOE, nationality unknown, who said to police that they worked legally at the bar/restaurant. The three restaurant workers told officers that there were five foreign tourists of unknown nationality who were extremely intoxicated". https://thephuketexpress.com/2023/03/27/wild-brawl-between-foreign-staff-and-tourists-goes-viral-in-patong-phuket-video/
  23. alcohol Very well deduced, but so what?
  24. When ever someone uses this in a sentence, it shows that they are a racist. No, rationally, it does not. To accuse someone of that just shows how illogical you are.
  25. https://www.aot-limousine.com/home.html
×
×
  • Create New...