Sorry, but you're wasting your time here, I'm afraid, you'll get nothing but sniping comments on precisely the subjects that you asked not to be commented on by people who can't read properly. Your own internet research would be more fruitful as would a conversation with a lawyer.
If you bothered to read the slogan, you wouldn't need to ask that question...it is "My body [,] my choice", not "My body is my choice".
Those in the photo are expressing their right to do what they want with their own bodies, none of them are claiming that they chose the body they have.
He can see what he is buying online, he can select the correct size by knowing his size and he will get a receipt purchasing online...if he chooses. you may not so choose.
Stop making things up. You have offered no proof that the latest survey was biased.
No, I am not making anything up, that "survey" of selected scientists was years ago and the proof is it's debunking that has been well publicised, that's the reason it's rarely brought up nowadays.
No. Should have asked, but don't want to appear too intrusive.
So you have no idea why the claim was denied so you just choose to irrationally slag-off the insurer?
No, they do not, "small print" is a myth, policies do have easily read conditions, though, that some people don't bother to read and when a claim is legally denied (because it wasn't covered from the start) the claimants call it "small print".
Depends on the reason for the claim being denied, it wouldn't be "disgusting" if it wasn't covered by the policy.
"Needless to say it's a Thai company".
Needless to say many people don't read what their cover extends to.