Liverpool Lou

That's odd, that's exactly what the OP reported!.. "Later the lady in question said before she fainted she had been to give blood..."

Read the link.

Seems as though the Thaivisa medics have concluded that he died from a heart attack, stroke, heroin abuse and Viagra use while off his head with alcohol in a diabetic coma. Sorted. Of course, he could have just died, something we all have to look forward to.

Jesus Christ...

Or he could have been drunk.

There we go.... it was just a matter of time before the ‘I’ve never had a problem’ ???????? poster pops up on a such a thread.... His sarcasm was just for your pleasure.

You think that reducing the number of available taxis would really help?

Can car owners now order lightning strikes on demand?... "People reported seeing the car struck by lightning before the fire started".

Yes, it is that time of year, it's all day, every day when Thaivisa posters take lame delight in Thai-bashing following a report that contains nothing but good, positive news.

What is it about the article that you don't approve of...a positive report about a RTP officer, maybe? The report about neighbours taking care of an abandoned child?

Why should there be a hidden meaning in an article that explained the circumstances very clearly?

So many? Such as which others that constitute that "so many"?

Not as much as you are.

No doubt? What do you base that assertion on?

Sunanta was clearly seen rummaging all over her boss’s bedroom and stealing money every day for over 21 times," So "all over her bedroom" isn't the same as "laying around"? "So "all over her bedroom" isn't the same as "laying around"?" No, obviously, it is not. That quote referenced the maid's action in searching, completely different from saying that the cash was just laying around.

You are, however (as per usual) seeming to make an argument for argument's sake. Just your opinion. Funny how having a differing, rational opinion is construed as "arguing for argument's sake".

That's all you seem to be suggesting. What does it matter how it was kept and why would you suggest that the taxman would be interested in the cash if you weren't hinting that it was dodgy.

"...for the public official not to take action far earlier". Evidence. That's why she had the camera installed, got the evidence and then reported the thefts.

Odd how so many posters think that the victim here is the bad guy and are ignoring the multi-million baht thieving secretary.

At least I'm not being outrageously libellous.

Small amounts went missing, she had no evidence until the camera was installed, then she reported it.

She doesn't have to. It was B10m over years, not "B10m lying around".

Got anything to back up that assertion?

So many "skeletons" that she had no problem reporting the missing money to the police.

Perhaps she was being paid from the mayor's own funds?