Liverpool Lou
-
Posts
26,525 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
1
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by Liverpool Lou
-
Trump on Immigration: "We need a lot of people coming in."
Liverpool Lou replied to John Drake's topic in Political Soapbox
bugga me i never thought Id agree with you on anything.............hny Most people come to their senses eventually! -
Unless modified for street use, and registered, they are illegal here to drive on the street. Edit ... you may be correct, and it was street legal, as someone else, with more time on his hands has pointed out. May be? I am correct.
-
Not up to the police as to whether he will be indicted though, that's up to the Prosecutor's Office.
-
https://www.khaosodenglish.com/news/2025/01/03/american-man-apologizes-to-family-of-thai-woman-killed-in-dirt-bike-accident/
-
https://www.khaosodenglish.com/wp-content/uploads/2025/01/american-rider4.jpg
-
Not representative of the road in question which is shown on the Khaosod English site.
-
Where has that been reported to be the case?
-
Why The CONFUSED e-moji ?? Whoever Put it on ?? Probably because what you posted wasn't factual. You care about who emojied your comment!?
-
Delete that immediately. Rational comment is not tolerated here!
-
Par for the <deleted> course.
-
I think that it is an AseanNow rule!
-
Hear, hear! 86% of the "10 dangerous days" deaths so far where on bikes.
-
There was a group of motorcyclists involved in this incident? Where was that stated?
-
Even more likely that all that over-imaginative speculation was probably not the case.
-
Which "group" was that?
-
Well said.
-
This isn't "where we come from", Thai laws apply here, and nowhere does it mention that she had right of way.
-
Is it? Doubtless you've got specific examples to justify that nonsense?
-
Why not...they're not illegal here are they?
-
I'd like to give you a "Thumbs up" or a "+1" but for some reason the emoji facility does not appear on your posts for me.
-
Trying to justify and defend statutory rape is not really a good look Lou. I agree, but that is not something that I have done, I have just asked you a question about a case that you are making assertions about and that you will not answer. That is not a good look, Jonny.
-
In the case in question, how old was she, was she "a child" or a teenager? I am not disputing the statutory rape definition.
-
I know, I was not disagreeing with you.
-
Having sex with a minor is statutory rape. How old was the teenager in that case, was she below the age of consent?
-
Is there only one case, you used plural? It's not even a case of child rape.
