Liverpool Lou

That's right but the person in the OP didn't lose his ATM card in the machine.

Lots of people, I have done, that's what the machine is there for. Who asks such a daft question?

It was obviously left in the cash deposit tray by the customer, it was not any "cash box", and had not been accepted as a deposit because he did not complete the transaction before walking away, it was his money and he left it there for anyone to find and steal.

No, it is not. You won't find "Finders keepers" in any statutes, it is just a juvenile's description of theft.

The bank is right, it is the customer's responsibility to ensure that he completes the transaction and does not leave B30k cash in the tray and walk away.

No, finding cash is not a crime but stealing it from the CDM is a crime.

People in each of those categories exist in your country, also.

You're right, it is not possible legitimately, unless he has someone bent in the phone company.

That's it, engage them and they will get around to it.

Those messages are not to you, they're to a phone number that happens to be yours; they haven't found you, yours is just one of thousands of numbers that are randomly called.

We know who complained then. Yes, it's no secret, it was me...about your insults.

Thank you.

Metered taxis on the streets are metered, regardless of whether it's a Corolla or a Fortuner, there are no different meter rates.

Many taxis in Bangkok are fitted with in-taxi cameras (and alarm buttons) nowadays and all new taxis are.

As most metered taxis are owned by legitimate co-operatives, not individuals, it's more likely that most meters would not be modified

What is? That he has been barred from the (women's) Olympics?

You claimed murder was natural. Bigots never have good arguments. No, I did not. If you think that I did, please quote my comment in which I claimed that "murder is natural". And be mindful of throwing "bigot" insults. At least I can read what is posted here.

Sex is natural and it is consenting people with no harm to others. Murder is not natural and harms others. You seem to have difficulty reading, I did not post that sex is not natural, neither did I post that sex harms anyone. You raised the subject of "murder", not me, and I did not say that it was natural, nor that it did not harm anyone.

Nobody cares about your opinion. You seem to care! But then I don't care if no one cares about my opinion, this is a forum where I am just as entitled as anyone else to express them, regardless!

There is no "must encourage and support" about it, you accept what you want to accept, I will hold my opinion that homosexual "tongue pashing and deep kissing openly in a public place", as you put it, is repulsive and inappropriate and certainly does not have to be tolerated in public.

You argued that the Romans were justified in killing people. Try reading what I actually posted and also what you have posted. I did not post that Romans were justified in killing people whereas you did post that homosexuality, because it happened in the Dark Ages 3000 years ago, should be considered as natural!

Well, you said it, it is unfortunate that we have our opinions.

The Romans were murderers. Interesting you are pro murder and anti sex. Strange morals you have. Very odd that your conclusion from my posting facts, not an opinion, leads you assume what my morals are and to ridiculously claim, with no justification, that I am "pro murder" and "anti-sex". Strange intellect you have.

If it happened a lot 3000 years ago then it makes it natural and a part of human development. Read about it in more detail; homosexual relationships between people of similar ages at that time were considered abnormal and perverted. The Romans habitually condemned people to death by lions and other wild animals, does that mean that to do so is also natural and part of human development and is something to be celebrated?

I am a buyer not a seller like you. "I am a buyer..." Lame, but interesting to know that you want to buy "full service" from him.