Jump to content

Liverpool Lou

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    26,539
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    1

Everything posted by Liverpool Lou

  1. Thought this was an English language forum?
  2. Well done....whoever got the joke. They're so slow.
  3. ...that will not apply to most people but may protect two distinct vulnerable groups.
  4. For some reason he does not want to deport that South African multi-billionaire who owns X. Neither does he want to deport "ALL immigrants"
  5. B0llocks. Only ILLEGAL immigrants was what he was referring to!
  6. What makes you think that those Starbucks items "are there for days in a row" and that the shelves are not frequently restocked with fresh items? Why should goods in a refrigerated display for a few hours show any "signs of decay"?
  7. And he appeared to stand up and walk after being thrown over the barrier.
  8. No idea what you mean. Doesn't surprise me.
  9. What are you saying? I suggest you avoid Phuket. I'm saying what I posted. I suggest that you read it and the OP.
  10. You don't know the difference between booked ride-hailing services and taxis?
  11. No, this has not been going on for many years; Grab, Bolt (or whichever service he booked) are not part of the "taxi mafia"!
  12. No, they cannot be interlinked, that has just been adjudicated in court and is not a "grey area". Vehicle tax applies to vehicles, fines such as these and traffic fines apply to people and the two have to remain separate. Issuance of car tax can no longer be refused for non-payment of fines.
  13. What does that comment say about so many AseanNow Thai-basher posters?
  14. Once again there is nothing definite, people could face fines etc. ..........LOL Once again an AN poster cannot understand what was actually reported. The "could" relates to the level of the fine in conjunction with "up to", not whether or not a fine will be issued. The issuance of a fine is definite.
  15. Yes, UOB have a branch here but it's not a Thai bank. UOBT is a Thai bank.
  16. @spidermike007made no claim of criminal charge or conviction. You've exaggerated his statement. No, I did not, he clearly stated that he should be locked up, something that cannot happen in his civil case. There is currently no contempt charge.
  17. Just another AN poster who cannot read.
  18. Why post a link that's behind a paywall, are you on commission from the FT?!
  19. Which specific standards do their construction not comply with?
×
×
  • Create New...