your initial question has no validity as you aren't talking about the same woman that is mentioned in my timestamp.
Yes, it does, I'm asking the same question about why that is addressed to "Russian apologists".
Those with "something to hide" are not likely to engage in two separate incidents with other members of the public that would encourage the police to be involved.
I think that it shows part of a woman's face almost completely hidden by a hooded jacket, excusing herself to go to work. What do you think it shows? Why does that need to be addressed to those who you assert apologise on behalf of Russians?
Start with 🤑 5,000,000 being paid to a bird for being naughty in a SHOP...........🤣
An event that she could barely recall the alleged details of...and she hasn't been paid yet. Smacks of the Brett Kavanaugh "case".
Forgot this already? What was Trump convicted of? Details on the 34 counts and his guilty verdict - CBS News
What was his sentence if he was convicted? Forget that already?