GammaGlobulin

a. Never had I heard the term "prop" or "props" b. Recently, this slang term "prop" has come into vogue. c. Why? d. Is this a new term?.... e. I thought to myself.... And then, it hit me. The term prop must have originated long ago, even though I knew not what it meant. My guess is that it must be sort of a black-culture term that has now been adopted outside black culture, into the mainstream. Here's what I'm talkin' 'bout.... You got the slang word PROPS here, for sure, at least twice. Do you enjoy using the word, PROPS? If so....then..... PROPS to you! Personally, I prefer the way they talk at Oxford and Cambridge. Not too many guys at Oxford that can Jive Talk, is my guess. What about you? Do YOU speak Jive? Regards, Gamma Note: Love this scene. Most great linguistics researchers do..... Someday, I, too, will speak JIVE....

Love is pain. Celibacy is the only way to go.

Actually, ....Yes.... Awesome is this film. Undeniably.

Please do not knock what you have not yet tried. Hermits got to make a living, too. Please keep your hospital bugs to yourselves, if you please....

Better, a bit.... Remastered, if true: Better? Are you... Feeling better? I mean..... I hope you are feeling better.....

Such a truly amazing film....but..... https://www.latimes.com/business/story/2020-01-16/elia-kazan-named-names Who cares, because, his Tree in Brooklyn film remains a true gem. Are you able to find fault with it? I cannot, but go ahead and make my day by trying.... Regards, Gamma Note: I don't normally enjoy films about childbirth, but this film is still watchable, and even.....sublime.... So then, enjoy.....

Yes....

I have about 8 computer displays hanging about here. No problem with the displays. But.... Seems the CPU wattage on this MB is only rated up to 150 watts. And, the CPU, i5-13600K, requires maximum 181 watts. Not sure if this might actually be a problem. STILL, a very nice MB at a very reasonable price, and available here, easily.... This is a budget MB which would be good for my purposes. Tks.

No WAY....Jose! I purchased two of these, almost identical, when I was in ChengDu, China, years ago. Total GARBAGE....IMHO.... Or, as Jonathan Winters might have better stated, in French... The price for this garbage...in China, when I bought one or two...was super cheap. Same garbage. Lower price in China...

In the fine print, this motherboard does not support CPUs using more than 125 watts of power, and otherwise it might be fine for me. Unfortunately, checking the CPU of my choice, the i5-13600K uses up to 181 watts. So, this MB is NG for this CPU. Otherwise, this MB would be almost perfect.

Anyway, One Desktop PC using on ASUS motherboard connected to four displays, while not using a discrete GPU? Not so easy... Three monitors to one PC is normal. But, four monitors seems to be atypical. How To: Not sure This is not the solution, by the way:

I, like you, have not been fooling around with assembling computers for about 9 or 10 years. I have never connected 4 monitors to one PC. I typically just have 3 monitors connected to one PC, and then... I use a second PC to add more monitors. But this time, I want to have only ONE PC run four monitors. So, I have heard about this: Also, I was thinking about daisy chaining HDMI monitors, or something. The problem is that, as far as I know, the ASUS motherboards do not have 4 ports of monitors, typically. The CPU I will buy DOES support 4 monitors. But, will the cheap ASUS motherboard I hope to buy allow connection of 4 monitors? IDK.... Anybody know?

Here is an interesting little review I found which seems to show that the 13600K is good for someone who does not want to replace their computer too often. Buy a good CPU, at first, and then use it for a very long time. Also, very decent integrated graphics on this Intel i5 CPU. Price is also good. The only downside might be power consumption My i5 CPUs are basically all just 65 watts. But, the 13600K is about double, according to what I have read. If you have your computers running 24/7/365, then this extra wattage is bound to make a difference. Still, it's mostly about onboard graphics, and this CPU is good enough in this respect, it seems. https://www.pcgamer.com/best-cpu-for-gaming/ Also, anyone interested in Intel i5 CPUs...might enjoy reading this: https://www.cpu-world.com/info/Intel/Intel_Core_i5.html https://www.cpu-world.com/CPUs/Core_i5/Intel-Core i5 i5-13600K.html Oh, well, then.... If an i5, then which ASUS mainboard? In light of the fact that 4 monitors must be connected.. NOTE:....

Which fanless GPU was he using? Also, it is utter stupidity to add unnecessary complexity to your build by adding a discrete GPU when this is completely unwarranted. Just choose a good CPU with integrated Intel graphics, and then there is no reason to add a graphics card, obviously.

Here is an important consideration when choosing a CPU: This means, next time I need to swap out a new motherboard, in case it dies, I will still be able to use my CPU with new motherboards, for quite a few years in the future, presumably.

Well, in fact, I will =====never===== use Apple products. Anyway, I am, here, speaking of Intel CPUs, integrated graphics, and four monitors, only. Not discussing Apple, actually. I am not considering AMD, also.

Sorry... Tks for your input....which... Is very much appreciated, by the way.

Never buy a discrete GPU! This is just one more thing to go wrong. If you can use integrated graphics, then you will save a lot of money. Discrete GPU sucks the Big One! As Torvalds told us.... NVIDIA: fU!

Furthermore: a. My main concern is to get the very best Intel integrated graphics. And, I could not care less about which Intel CPU I choose. b. I do NOT want to buy a third-party CPU cooler. Third-party coolers suck. They always die. c. I will NEVER, EVER choose a discrete GPU card. These SUCK THE BIG ONE! They always die, in the end, long before the Intel CPU. Just saying....

By the way, in December of 2012, as I recall, I bought an i5-2500K CPU in Taipei, the year that the i5 CPU was a big deal. That CPU is still going strong in one of my desktop computers. Works great. I replaced the mainboard twice. But, the CPU is still fine.

I will NEVER again buy a discrete GPU. I will ONLY buy CPU with integrated graphics. This is certain. So, I just need Intel 770 integrated graphics, it seems.

Also, while I am at it.... Would you go for a cheaper cooler than this one, for the 13600K CPU? Why doesn't Intel just supply an Intel stock cooler, anyway???!!! I do not understand this. In the past, Intel supplied stock coolers for its K CPUs, in fact. (By the way, I never intend to overclock this CPU....) Note: I do not like third-party CPU coolers! I have had very bad luck with them. The best coolers are the stock coolers from Intel.....

a. This CPU should be plenty to run four computer displays. b. The only question might be which ASUS mainboard would be suitable for the task. c. As someone already stated, one should not scrimp when choosing a decent CPU. d. This CPU has decent integrated graphics, and enough power to last for, maybe, another 8 years. e. But, how long with socket 1700 be popular? If the mainboard dies, will I be able to buy a new motherboard during the next three or four years, socket 1700?

Someday, I will be under the weather... Then, some will dance on my grave. As long as you are happy.... This is all I truly care about.

Actually, this CPU is better at a slightly higher cost: CPU (ซีพียู) INTEL CORE I5-13600K 3.5 GHz (SOCKET LGA 1700) But, which mainboard can I use with this CPU to attach 4 monitors, and this question still stands.