NoDisplayName

Could be thought he was MS-13.

Dunno. Have only used it half a dozen times, and no calls dropped.

I downloaded VIBER when SKYPE went away. No problem calling toll-free 800 numbers in the US.

Your title "Norwegian tourist, 21, is barred from entering the US after ICE guards find JD Vance Meme" left out the words "allegedly" and "claimed the tourist" on his Instagram and Facebook accounts. The other side of the story: CBP said in a post on X that “Mads Mikkelsen was not denied entry for any memes or political reasons, it was for his admitted drug use.” https://time.com/7297472/jd-vance-meme-mads-mikkelsen-tourist-denied-entry-cbp-ice/ It's technically true he was denied entry after border agents found the meme, but it's equally true that the agents denied entry after they ate breakfast prior to their daily shift.

Not a treaty, and not an international legal obligation, according to..................the US government. See above. Can't have it both ways. A political "deal" isn't binding on the Iranians if it's not binding on the other parties to the "deal." I'll let you google it if'n ya like, but I recall one of the provisions of the "deal" was that restrictions on Iran would be nullified if one of the other parties exited the "deal" or if the promised sanctions relief was not accomplished.

On November 19, 2015, the State Department sent a letter to then-Representative Mike Pompeo that severely undercuts the notion that the Iran deal represents any form of binding American commitment. It turns out that the Obama administration not only acknowledged that the deal wasn’t a treaty (obvious enough), but it also admitted that it wasn’t “an executive agreement” or even a “signed document.” https://www.nationalreview.com/corner/iran-nuclear-deal-not-signed-document-not-binding/ In a letter recently released by Representative Mike Pompeo (R-KS), the State Department emphasized that the Iran deal – the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) – is not binding under international law. The letter was in response to Pompeo’s inquiry about why the JCPOA transmitted to Congress lacked signatures. https://www.lawfaremedia.org/article/state-department-affirms-iran-deal-only-political-commitment Sorry.

Nowhere in there does it limit enrichment.

The IEAE is not a treaty, it is a UN organization that monitors individual nations' nuclear programs based on provisions of the NPT. The NPT does not set limits on enrichment. Sorry.

Trump exited the treaty, Europe never fulfilled. JCPOA no longer applies. NPT does not set limits on enrichment.

60% is permitted under the NPT. Iran voluntarily committed to a 3.5% ceiling under the JCPOA. Trump unilaterally exited, applied sanctions. Europe did not fulfill their part of the deal. JCPOA is dead, NPT applies.............for now. I was not correct in 6 months notice to exit the treaty. The requirement is 3 months.

Not prohibited under NPT.

20% needed to fuel the Tehran reactor for medical isotopes. 60% enrichment is not prohibited under the NPT. Exit the NPT and they, too, can make nukes for defense. Winning!©

At $20,000,000 each, they appear just as effective as our floating piers. Effective at supporting luxurious MIC lobbyist lifestyles.

The IAEA has been shown to be passing intelligence to the US, and Iran has not been receiving the benefits due under the non-proliferation treaty, nor was the JCPOA ever honored by the US or Europe. Iran now has every right to exit the treaty with six months notice, boot out the inspectors, and continue with their peaceful civilian nukular program. Trump can now helicopter onto one of his supercarriers with a bigly banner proclaiming "Mission Accomplished."

Just received email from Fidelity. They tell me if medallion service is unavailable, customers can call in to send a SWIFT online.

You should post a link to the story. https://thethaiger.com/hot-news/crime/man-in-prachuap-khiri-khan-arrested-for-drug-possession The operation was prompted by local reports about the tenant’s reclusive behaviour, lack of employment, and possession of firearms, causing concern among residents. Although no firearms were found, an empty 9mm ammunition box was discovered along with 708 methamphetamine pills stored in pink containers with foil and other drug paraphernalia.

Assume many are deported for illegal entry without bothering with a trial for the drug/shoplifting/domestic violence/drunk&disorderly/fake ID/no license or insurance offenses they may have been picked up on. No point in following through, the prosecutor may decide not to go to trial. They'd likely just get probation anyway, and be released to........deportation.

Spain is the new Pattaya.

Goal posts have wheels. Who knew! How many ILLEGALS are welcomed? Not How many LEGAL visitors commit crimes?

Deflect! Deflect! Deflect! Is Spain accepting LEGAL immigrants from Latin America? Yes, they are. They are not opening the borders for illegals. How many of the LEGAL immigrants are MS-13 cornpops? I din't say or imply that particular cornpop was an "undocumented US American." The photo is simply an illustration of one of the major exports of the southern region. Your gotcha din't getcha much.

Strange logic. "They don't commit crimes other than the crimes they've already committed." Illegal = deportable. They can apply for a LEGAL visa from their home country...if they have no additional crimes on their record. Shirley, if they were such upstanding, law-abiding non-citizens, this would be a small price to pay for a LEGAL entry and potential pathway to citizenship.

And nothing to do with ILLEGAL immigration. How many ILLEGAL immigrants currently being deported from the US have been willingly accepted by Spain? How many MS-13 cornpops have been warmly welcomed in Mallorca?

14th amendment, section 2: Representatives shall be apportioned among the several States according to their respective numbers, counting the whole number of persons in each State, ...... How are they counted? By census. Does the census ask about citizenship? No, not since 1950. What is census data used for? Hmmmmmmmmmmm...........

You could repeat talking points, or you could google actual data. Legal Immigration and Adjustment of Status Report Supporting data tables (at bottom of this webpage) are additionally provided for these four categories: Lawful Permanent Residents (LPR) Refugee Admissions Naturalizations Nonimmigrant (I-94) Admissions https://ohss.dhs.gov/topics/immigration/legal-immigration-and-adjustment-status-report

Not at all. You brought up that individual as an example of sorts. Legal immigrant or illegal?