27 minutes ago, Virt said:

No idea how soldiers should react in wartime, but wouldn't it be best for them to surrender in this specific situation?

They seem to be trapped in a place with no chance of reinforcements and such.

 

Of course no one knows what the Russians will do with them if they surrender, so it's also a gamble to surrender.

 

Mariupol seems to be a living hell on earth where thousands of civilians has been murdered.

I hope the Russians are not able to cover it up, and that they will pay the price for their horrendous actions.

 

I also hope the worlds weapon supplies are coming very fast, since Intel seems to indicate the Russians will try to cut off a whole lot of Ukrainian soldiers in the east.

 

They need all the howitzers, helicopters and armored vehicles they can use and it's about time we start supplying them with fighter jets as well.

 

Russia crossed the red line a long time ago, and Ukraine should get everything they need to fight of the Russians.

If they surrender they will become prisoners of war and protected by the Geneva Convention. They could then be used in prisoner exchanges with the Russians.

On 4/15/2022 at 3:56 PM, RocketDog said:

She suggested that I move from Cha-am to live with her there. I told her flatly that would never happen.

Why not?

23 minutes ago, GroveHillWanderer said:

The sentiments expressed in this picture, posted at the very beginning of the war, are starting to look more apt every day.

 

Is that before he pushes the button or after? ☹️

"Be careful what you wish for"

1 hour ago, 2 is 1 said:

NOTIFICATION:

 

Putin takes revenge for sunken Russian ship and bombs Kyiv in new onslaught

VLADIMIR PUTIN's troops have hit a military plant in Kyiv and will intensify attacks on the region in response to Ukrainian attacks on Russian targets, the Russian Defence Ministry has said.

Daily Express

4 hours ago, Cake Monster said:

And Thailand has always been a place to attract more than its share of drunken Idiots

Yup, hiccup, sorry about that 

7 minutes ago, rudi49jr said:

Maybe these billionaires can stage a coup against Putin, just so they can play with their expensive toys again.

How? They have lost their power with their money.

18 minutes ago, Chomper Higgot said:

The Moskva no longer has any ability to launch any warheads, conventional or nuclear.

That's obvious, it is at the bottom of the sea! 

7 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

They are welcome to build as many targets as they want, as no one is threatening them at present. Aircraft carriers are the new Capital ships when it comes to projecting power during peace time, as the Americans learned long ago.

During a war they just become a very large target. Missiles have changed warfare significantly, as the Exocet proved against the British navy in the Falklands.

 Haha, You are quoting a military engagement from 40 years ago in support of your theories. I think you know little about military/naval matters.

31 minutes ago, thaibeachlovers said:

Given advanced anti ship missile systems entire surface navies may have become obsolete. A patrol boat armed with one may be able to sink anything afloat.

I'm sure the British will be observing with great interest given they have spent so much to build 2 floating targets.

...and China is rapidly building a second. 

Superiphone

34 minutes ago, RJRS1301 said:

https://thebarentsobserver.com/ru/security/2016/09/russia-moves-missiles-finnish-border

 

Russia has announced that two s-400 missile defence systems have been moved to the Finnish border.

Why? Do they expect Finland to attack Russia with missiles?

So what? Boris has been fined and no doubt he will pay the penalty in due course. Case closed. On the scale of 'crimes' that all the greedy Parliamentarians get up to, having a drink in an illegal party has got to be right at the bottom of the scale. 

Now he has bigger fish to fry with Russia threatening to nuke Britain in 5 minutes. So he better get on with the job.

Russia 'moves heavy military equipment including missile systems towards Finnish border after warning Finland not to join NATO'

Daily Mail

42 minutes ago, Kwasaki said:

BBC world reporting Ukrainian soldiers surrender no ammunition left not good hope there treated well. 

Fake news, don't believe what you read from the leftie BBC.

It will grow into a dangerous dog. ☹️

On 4/10/2022 at 12:32 PM, Chris.B said:

Well done Boris! 

 

Boris in Kiev

 

Look at how happy the Ukrainian civilian was to see Boris. Check ot 00:40. Genuine surprise followed by happiness.

1 minute ago, Bruno123 said:

 

No...1000 baht is not to be expected. You pay that if you need speeds over 30 Mbps and reception and your equipment allows you to attain the high speeds for which you would pay. Otherwise better to stick to the capped speed plans for 300 baht per month and less.

I said "if you choose an unlimited use plan". Don't misquote me please.

3 hours ago, JetsetBkk said:

  Please get back to reality.

back to reality....

"And even a Ukrainian MP urged Mr Biden to make the "bold move" by copying Mr Johnson's recent trip.

Kira Rudik told Fox News it would "really be a sign of solidarity".

She added Mr Johnson's appearance was "uplifting", "very motivational" and stressed "everybody admires Johnson"."

Daily Express

31 minutes ago, KannikaP said:

I got a DTAC SIM off Lazada, 20Gb/s but usually faster, 60 GB per month, Bht 1200 ! Works perfectly.

Reception depends on how close you are to the mobile network antenna.

Looks like you will have to use mobile internet. I am not sure if a mobile antenna would improve reception. Worth trying though.

If you choose an unlimited use package, then 1000 baht a month is to be expected.