Jingthing

Donbass is Ukraine. You're free to spread your Putin Z fascist propaganda here or anywhere you like though.

Again, it's not over. Putin was going to take Kyiv in two days. I have nothing really to say to people like you spreading such blatant misinformation. I don't understand your motivation to do that either.

I am not talking about the US military being involved.

Bizarre post. I started the thread.

There's always some jokers on the internets.

I'd rather not but that's very true. What a disaster that would be.

No, it's not over. It's looking like Ukraine is getting permission to use long range missiles within Russia soon.

So you're talking more like eight years from now. Good luck. I would welcome a more normal republican party but I think it's going to be harder than you think to de-maga-ize. It's bigger than Trump.

As far as a much fairer peace deal, sadly Ukraine might need to do give up lands permanently to Russia but for that to happen they need something very big in return -- EU and NATO membership.

Moronic straw man argument not worth seriously responding to. Russia started the war in 2014.

How is that happening?!?

I will add something that should be obvious but probably isn't to many. WANTING Ukraine to win isn't the same thing as saying Ukraine WILL win. The west has bought into Putin's nuclear threat fear mongering and has placed way too many restraints on what they will allow Ukraine to actually do. So the west has wanted to Ukraine to win but not made it possible out of fear of Ukraine actually winning. As more and more of Russian's so called red lines are crosssed, it has become more clear that Putin's threats are all bluff. For Ukraine to actually win, they will need much more aid from the west and also the end of unreasonable restraints. Iran's recent missile aid to Russia is turning the tide. But the US election is paramount.

What kind of US president can't answer YES to that question? A US president who is Putin's poodle. A US president who still feels butt hurt that Zelinsky wouldn't agree to assert dirt against Biden to win the last election (and was later impeached for that). For sleaze ball arguably traitorous Trump, everything is transactional, and everything is about his personal grievances. It's shocking that he still has a decent chance to take power again. The future of this war, the future of Ukraine continuing as a sovereign nation, possibly the future of the world depends on the upcoming US election.

The thoroughly unlikeable JD Vance recently gave away Trump's so called peace plan. It's a total surrender! Allow Russia to keep all occupied lands. Have Ukraine withdraw from Russian land. Have a so called demilitarized zone. Have Ukraine pledge to not seek NATO or EU membership. If anyone sees that as a fair peace compromise, you're totally deluded. Putin could paint that as a massive victory and he'd be right.

No, it's a war topic.

The similarities are many is why. You really don't see that?!?

You would say that to Hitler? You're deluded if you think Putin wants peace and can be fairly negotiated with. He wants to win. He only wants surrender. It's a binary choice. You support his goals or the goals of Ukraine and their western supporters.

Wait for the election results before you jump to that conclusion.

The title says it all. Either you want Ukraine to win, or you want Russia to win. Yet the disgraced former US president Trump refused to say yes. I appreciate his honesty. For anyone that didn't know where he stands before, they should by now.

So not a communist Comrade Kamala as stinking liar Donald J Trump asserts?

In that tragic event of Trump coming back to power, I think we will never hear about this empty and impractical promise ever again.

What gets me is that credible people are correctly saying that the tax situation will be an individual thing and it will be impossible to announce full conclusions that will be correct for everyone's specific financial situation. Then they say to pay for personal advice. But the final rules are not even set and we have no understanding of how any of this will actually be enforced, or not once they are set. So let's say you pay for personal advice now. It's my impression that given how ambiguous this all still is, that if you paid for such personalized advice from five given "experts" now that you would most likely get five different "expert" opinions. I'm sure this is a going to be a bonanza for such "experts" but at least at this stage, this is a completely ridiculous situation. I will be willing to pay for such advice from a well referred "expert" at a later time when the odds are higher that they actually know how things actually are going to be. Now seems wildly premature. I reckon I will probably end up paying more for advice than tax though which is kind of absurd. RANT OVER.

Well he has expressed interest in Venezuela He loves dictators period. Doesn't matter if from the left or right. He could probably build a beachside Margarine Lardo 2.0 there.

I want to see Trump fleeing to Budapest.

New York Post opinion piece from a pro Trump rag.