Jingthing

What's that supposed to mean?

Then go away! This is a gay forum topic.

Not Wilton Manors.

It's not bizarre at all. We're getting into borderline hostile responses.

Watch the video and sample some of the podcasts if you're really interested.

The options are.much much wider than such more stereotyped places. About those you missed the most obvious in the US, Wilton Manors (Ft. Lauderdale) and Palm Springs and Puerto Vallarta in Mexico. An example of the much more surprising Rochester New York for trans people and Cleveland Ohio for lots of gay culture and support services combined with affordable housing. Yeah most gay people can't afford places like Palm Springs. Ironically I have a relative who has invited me to move in to her luxurious new custom built house on the Delaware shore close enough to Rehoboth. That might be tempting but the area has incredibly high housing costs plus a shortage of doctors for Medicare patients so even if I was offered a break on rent there would be inevitable bad feelings and resentment because there is no way I could afford market rent there. Plus a car required.

Turns out (who knew?) that gay people in retirement have some issues and concerns that are beyond the heteronormative universe. The Where Gays Retire Facebook page and podcast is international in scope and tries to cover these issues and concerns on top.of the usual ones that are more general. Yes there is a podcast about Pattaya! It's by an American so although International destinations are covered US choices dominate. Lots to explore. If you find something interesting in all this, please comment. Interview with founder Podcast https://podcasts.apple.com/us/podcast/where-do-gays-retire-podcast/id1637780553 FB where do gays retire Facebook to apply for group membership if interested This topic is specifically for LGBT people. Hostile anti LGBT comments are extremely unwelcome.

A surrender deal.

They already do that. All year. Every year.

I want to speak to that. I don't celebrate the deaths of any soldiers per se but in the harsh reality of a war situation when the Ukrainian defenders take over 1000 Russian army terrorists off the field of battle every day I am happy to see that as a sign Ukraine has a chance to win. Fascist dictator Putin doesn’t even care about the lives of his own meat grinder terrorist soldiers (mostly poor, minorities, and from remote province) so to him Ukrainian civilians are less than nothing.

Parroting dear leader.

If convicted his numerous appeals will last for years anyway. This is just noise.

They're on completely different sides on the Russian war on Ukraine. He's just making a play for the stupider set of her supporters.

Trump always projects attacks of what he is. Classic fascist move.

Thanks for sharing your thoughts. They were rather too personal for me to feel comfortable answering directly. Suffice it for me to repeat that repatriation is not my preference and that I see it as a last resort.

I agree. What really gets me about these western Z bozos is how hard they're working to get others to join them.

Hold your horses. I suggested nothing of the kind. I just asked if they can fairly be called traitors. I can see purely technically because NATO and Russia are not officially at war (yet still basically are) calling them traitors isn't fair. So I'm looking for another word. I said nothing about penalties. I'm fine if such people move to Russia. Their support of the war against Ukraine does offend me very much though. I will add that a very visible leader of the pro Putin/pro Z fascist war American living in Russia describes what's happening as a new cold war. I don't think so! This is much more than a COLD war, isn't it? BTW -- he says God is on Russia's side to win the war.

So as that hasn't happened is there something nasty that they can be called?

Yeah, what's the point.

Personally I don't even want to visit Egypt, but I am a bit curious about Morocco.

Biden was invited? Why would they invite Biden to that?

I have a question. Americans or other NATO westerners that move to Russia, publish propaganda about how great Russia is compared to the west, and openly support Russia to win over Ukraine -- can they fairly be labeled as traitors? The same scenario in WW2 would have no ambiguity -- they would be traitors 100 percent. So the underlying question is if NATO is at was with Russia (the Russian government definitely thinks so). If that's actually the case, they are traitors, yes?

Mother Theresa was rather an A-hole.

Ridiculous

I think there is a retirement visa for Egypt.