CallumWK

Because the company was still fully operational, despite an order to cease operations

https://finance.yahoo.com/news/the-white-house-cited-these-economists-to-justify-its-tariffs-they-arent-thrilled-193615537.html The White House cited these economists to justify its tariffs. They aren't thrilled. The researchers took issue with some shortcuts and questionable math by the Trump administration. A few of the notes jokingly congratulated him. But how did he really feel? “Confused,” Soderbery told Yahoo Finance. After all, he said, his study had been written to discourage exactly the kinds of policies Trump was rolling out. Certainly, nobody from the administration had consulted with him. “I don’t want it to turn into infamy,” Soderbery added, laughing. Soderbery isn’t the only economist with qualms about how their work was used as part of the White House tariff push. And while the complaints of a few academics might not seem significant compared to, say, the stock market’s panicked stampede this week, they do raise questions about the rigor that went into planning America’s most sweeping import taxes in over a century.

I'm pretty sure that Rayong has shopping malls that have a Aurora branch, which sell gold bars.

Musk is hated more than Trump. Latest news is that Musk may depart from DOGE

Where is Joseph ?

Harris, you not satisfied with 1 account?

At least your BS is funnier than Ralf's BS

If that was to be true, there would be no taxes under Trump, as he clearly is doing his best to wipe out civilization in the US

I guess so. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/we-now-know-the-full-extent-of-trumps-reciprocal-tariffs-theyre-huge-232020114.html We now know the full extent of Trump's reciprocal tariffs. They’re huge. If import purchases stayed the same, that would raise the tariff bill to about $960 billion, making it an $880 billion tax hike paid by American businesses and consumers. “It’s the biggest tax hike on Americans since the 1940s,” trade expert Inu Manak of the Council on Foreign Relations told Yahoo Finance on April 2. “The only thing these tariffs are going to do is increase costs.”

Another evidence that maga cult boys have no idea what they are talking about. Those 2 items you mention will actually account for the smallest part of the deficit, but there are a lot of other things which the Americans have no own source for. Better you educate yourself before opening your gob

Did you know that the past is not a guarantee for the future? It should be obvious from what has changed since January 21

Yes I think I confused you with someone else. Apologies

Let's hope it will be a job for president and vice president that returns to the US soon.

Then please explain how they will be competitive against imported goods, when they will be price gouging on top of the higher manufacturing cost due to the tariffs on their imported parts. The result will be that the US economy goes to the drain, because goods get too expensive, and factories will close and people lose their job. But I also know from your post history that you are a Trump supporter, so you will keep switching your words to justify what your master is destroying.

Here's another one. https://finance.yahoo.com/news/trump-administration-adds-beer-imports-155034830.html Trump administration adds beer, can imports to 25% US aluminum tariffs WASHINGTON (Reuters) - The U.S. Commerce Department on Wednesday revised President Donald Trump's 25% tariffs on derivative aluminum products to include all beer and empty aluminum can imports. Trump's worst-case scenario tariffs could cost Americans $3,800 a year. Are the MAGAs ready for that? That's a big reduction in spending on alcohol, chew and cigarettes.

I know very well how tariffs work, but obviously you and Trump don't.

You could try US cars to start with, then move on to probably the other 80% of goods manufactured in the US.

And how about the tariffs on the parts they have to import to produce their goods in the US?

Or maybe it's because he's a well known troll, who is just here to upset people?

Then why they weren't competitive before the tariffs?

Based on a report by Daily Mail 2025-04-02 It is what happens when you take an article from another source, then let AI rape it.

I know we have a health forum. How about a mental health forum, exclusively for Bob?

Because they are cheap. And about BYD, let them first prove themselves. Because they have sold cheap nice looking cars for a few years, doesn't mean they are good. Let's talk again in 4-5 years.