JonnyF

Do you really think these "anti-vaxxers" oppose all vaccines in all circumstances? Or do you think it might be a little more nuanced than that?

How can they choose not to take steps to avoid it if you are proposing preventing them having it and "saving money on medical costs" on those who disagree with you. What percentage of things to you propose they are in agreement with you on in order to be allowed to have the vaccine? Would Pro Palestine, Pro Trans, Pro mask, Pro Starmer be sufficient? Perhaps we could start demanding patients declare their hatred of Trump before being allowed emergency medical treatment as well? That should thin out those awful people who disagree with you.

Gaslighting in the extreme. At least try to make it sound serious. 😃 You'll be claiming they are Pro Israel next. 😄 The BBC is too far gone. Beyond saving. Defund them and let the leftie extremists pay a subscription for their Pro Hamas propaganda.

Indeed. But we have to remember that the left are always very selective about which science they follow, and invariably get it wrong.

Freedom of choice, Fairy. If they want it, fine. If they don't want it, fine. I guess you're too far down the leftist authoritarian big state rabbit hole to understand the concept of bodily autonomy.

You're right. But much as I dislike Thunberg, the inevitable outcome of a scantily clad, opinionated, Western female playing the hero to Hamas soldiers is not something I would wish on even the gobbiest lefty Karen.

So essentially allow people to die if they not agree with you on certain issues? This is great Chomps. You're really making progress in coming out with your true beliefs. Tell us more.

These Chinese EV's are so cheap now that many people are going to trade in their Honda Wave and buy one. I would expect the traffic issues in Bangkok to get far worse in the next few years as congestion beating motorbikes are traded for these tin cans with a battery pack. Not to mention queues at the charging stations. Parking at the shopping malls. Wear and tear on the roads. Increased rubber consumption as two skinny wheels are traded for 4 big ones under a tonne of lithium. Just what Asia needs, more cars on the roads. I certainly wouldn't want to be in a crash in one of these 255,000 Baht sardine cans either.

Well given that it was Quake who said that I guess the answer would be No. 😄 Try harder Chomps. 😄

GBNews is far from perfect, but at least it provides a semblence of balance to the rampant extreme leftism of Chaneel 4, The BBC and Sky.

Yes, after the government had already stated their guilt on social media. A free and fair trial - North Korea style.

Unless you're on the right of course. In that case, the home office declares you a criminal before you've even stepped foot in a court.

I doubt they'll build 25% of the target. It won't matter anyway, they are a one term government.

Ah the old "who is going to clean our toilets" line. Is that you Kelly? 😄 https://www.bbc.com/news/newsbeat-33782498

It's the scourge of identity politics. As a gay man... As a black man... As a mother... As a transwoman... People use this at the start of a sentence to make the rubbish they are about to say more credible. Identity politics is putting equality back decades. Everyone wants to be special, according to (in most cases) immutable characteristics. Who cares what colour you are or who/what you like to have sex with (as long as it is legal). Just stop being a muppet and everyone will get on fine. The Lords got something right for once.

That's up to the EU. Having let them into the EU, it is an EU problem. What they shouldn't do is enable them onto boats to non-EU countries. Especially non-EU countries that are paying EU countries hundreds of millions of Euros to stop them doing just that. https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-politics-64916446 Of course, in reality France doesn't want them either so they turn a blind eye.

It's definitely illogical. Why is buying a beer at 711 at 1:45pm OK but at 2:15pm illegal? Why is smoking tobacco and cannabis legal but a vape is illegal? Why is buying a lottery ticket legal but betting on a football match illegal? Why are ST rooms in Pattaya bars allowed, but not in BKK bars? It's all very strange.

The vast majority are coming over from France.

What a surprise. Greta hanging out with Jihadists. Never saw that coming. 😄 Anyway, she's been detained and will be deported. Lucky for her it was the Israeli government she was protesting against and not Hamas or she might be missing a head right now. https://edition.cnn.com/2025/06/08/middleeast/freedom-flotilla-gaza-aid-ship-thunberg-intl-hnk

Why would you assume that Xi's China and Starmer's Britain are enemies? Quite the opposite. Very similar philosophies, I'd imagine Starmer will be bending Xi's ear on how best to silence dissent to the regime.

So you would therefore agree that the following view in itself is not an extreme wing terrorist ideology. That's great - nice to have agreement on the issue. Perhaps you should email Prevent and voice your displeasure at their mischaracterization of such a commonly held belief.

It would be mildy amusing, until I start to wonder which group they will raid to try to make up the shortfall? I mean they've already removed the pensioners fuel allowance, done a land grab on the farmers, removed much needed benefits from disabled/special needs people, added VAT to children's school fees. Surely they're running out of vulnerable groups to go after?

She is a problem that Starmer has to "manage". Given her increasingly vocal outburts against Starmer, it seems that strategy is failing.

They are defining the ideology itself (the subject of this thread) as extreme right wing terrorist ideology. It is possible to hold that belief without advocating violence or discrimination, but they (and you) are trying to conflate the two in order to shut it down. In order to silence people. Since labeling everyone a racist has clearly failed, now the left are trying a new tactic. They are now labeling people terrorists by defining a (farily commonly held) view that they do not agree with a terrorist ideology. Most likely because that carries the increased threat of a jail sentence and therefore they are hoping people will be scared into silence. Judging by what I am seeing on social media, it is failing spectacularly. Don't give up though...

Holding a belief that western culture is under threat from mass immigration is not advocating violence. The two are not even nearly the same thing. It is simply an opinion that you do not like being voiced, therefore you try to conflate it with a non existant call for violence in order to shut it down. Nobody listens when the left shout RACIST at people they disagree with, so now they are shouting TERRORIST instead. It's pretty pathetic to see.