-
Posts
16,992 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
18
Content Type
Events
Forums
Downloads
Quizzes
Gallery
Blogs
Everything posted by JonnyF
-
But Liberals ignore that because they don't expect any better of the Thais. Oh, and it's cheap to live there (partly due to the far right policies).
-
Actually normally presidential nominees are selected through a democractic process. Harris skipped this because she ticked the right boxes.
-
There was no error. You just didn't understand the use of brackets in the structure of the sentence (or pretended not to). Let me make it simpler for you. Some liberals are antisemitic like the Nazis were.
-
Cognitive dissonance 101.
-
Because they support racism against these groups. A very conservative estimate.
-
Because I abhor racism and sexism. I can see why you're OK with it though...
-
Luckily for you I don't charge for such observations. Including many liberals. If you can't comprehend or deliberately misinterpret for cheap point scoring, that's on you.
-
Exactly. Picking candidates based on race/sex is racist/sexist.
-
That's a shame, they might be more self aware. They certainly throw the racist/bigot label around in most conversations where someone disagrees with them. Read it again and learn how brackets work. I didn't say the Nazis called for the elimination of Israel, I said they were anti-semitic. It's many liberals calling for the elimination of Israel (from the river to the sea).
-
Female to male athletes rarely wish to compete against real males. It's a disadvantage. What's the word I am looking for? Oh that's right, unfair. Just like male to female athletes competing against women. Those with chromosome abnormalities are a minority within a minority. Their numbers are so small that to focus on this is just to deflect. There is an argument for creating a specific category in the special olympics for them but they cannot be used to justify men dressed as women dominating Elite womens sport as you are attempting to do.
-
Really? 😃 Many liberals I know support racist policies like so called positive discrimination and apply the "one drop" rule to labeling people black. Many believe people should vote on racial grounds ("If you vote Trump you ain't black" - Joe Biden). Many are obstinately attached to beliefs and prejudiced to people with different opinions (bigoted). Many are anti-semitic (calling for the elimination of Israel), as the Nazis were. Many support authoritarian leadership and subordination of individual interest for the perceived good of the nation like fascists do. Liberals, so often exactly what they accuse others of being.
-
I don't think this will happen. It's much easier and more enjoyable for leftists to label anyone who disagrees with them as racist, bigoted, fascist, Nazis. stupid, deplorable etc. Therefore it will continue unabated, and they will alienate swing voters just as Hilary did and just as the Brexit Remainers did. They never learn.
-
Meghan Markle’s Regrets and Isolation After Royal Exit
JonnyF replied to Social Media's topic in World News
If the media lose interest, I'm sure the Markles will find something to drum it back up. They need the media like a fish needs water. -
I probably wouldn't have one if I was living in a Pattaya shoe box condo chasing bargirls like many expats. But on the farm my dogs kill vermin (rats, snakes, lizards etc.) as well as discouraging locals from stealing our fruit, tools etc. or turning up horny at 2am after too much Thai Whisky when I am away working in Bangkok. Much more trustworthy than a local security guard.
-
I wouldn't consider a Staffordshire Bull Terrier or American Stafforshire Terrier to be a Pitbull. To me, the only breed that is a PitBull is an American PitBull Terrier. But yes it is a very broad term that different people use differently to cover any number of breeds. So when you are comparing a group of breeds to single breeds the stats are meaningless. It's like lumping all Japanese car brands together and then comparing their crash stats to a BYD Atto 3. An American Bully is not a PitBull. People might consider it one, but they are wrong. It's no more PitBull than an English Bulldog.
-
Your friend was clearly an idiot. A dog that attacks an animal that the owner is also clearly trying to kill is completely different to a dog attacking a member of the family. The dog would have considered himself to be helping the owner. Protecting him. Chaining dogs up outside is also stupid. They need to live within a family, especially Staffys (nicknamed the nanny dog due to it's excellent nature with children). There were 3 animals present that day, unfortunately the one who survived was the stupidest of the lot.
-
This thread is an excellent example why stats for "PitBull" attacks appear high. Mis-identification. These dogs were American Bullys. Yet everyone on the thread is talking about PitBulls. So much ignorance I really shake my head sometimes. Look at the snout, the body type, the mouth, the legs. Looks nothing like a "PitBull" (assuming people using that broad term mean American PitBull Terrier) to anyone with a modicum of knowledge about the breed. When you classify multiple different breeds of dog as a PitBull it's no wonder the stats look high. It's like blaming BMW's for accidents every time a German car crashes. Ignorance.