JonnyF

So they were innocent criminals? 😄

So why didn't they tweet that the child killer was guilty before the trial? He was engaged in murder after all.

And neither should be labelled as guilty by the government until found so in a court of law. In this case, one was, one wasn't. Classic Labour you might say.

But they had not had their day in court. They had not been found guilty. Labour are not the judge, jury and executioner (or at least shouldn't be). It's prejudicial to the trial as you well know.

You also like people being labelled as criminals by the government on social media before they get their day in court. Given your political leanings, hardly surprising.

No it wasn't. A government should not label large groups of people (sone innocent, some not) as criminals before their trial starts. It is prejudicial. You should know that.

Again, my point is they did it with the rioters but not with the child slayer. One rule for one, one rule for another. Just how you like it.

No, my point is they did it with the rioters but not with the child slayer. 2 tier system.

Just as the "Made in Rwanda" killer was engaging in the murder of children. Yet everyone had to stay quiet to ensure a fair trial. Double standards. Some might say "2 Tier justice".

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62688532

It's also not difficult to surmise that someone hacking up small children at a dance class is a horrible violent cowardly scumbag terrorist murderer. It would not have been appropriate for the Home office to tweet that before his trial. But then, this is a 2 Tier system so one gets tweeted while the other gets warnings to stay silent on the matter to avoid prejudicing the trial.

Don't recall seeing your outrage when he was bowing down to the old king and covering up his degenerate son's crimes.

Some did. Some didn't. But how is it fair to label them as criminals, publicly on social media (X) before they had even had a trial? How is that not prejudicial? https://freespeechunion.org/fsu-writes-to-home-secretary-yvette-cooper-over-prejudicial-criminals-tweet-2/ It's one rule for one and one for another. That's why he's called 2 Tier Keir. Badenoch was right to point it out.

Classic Democrat reporting. They never let the truth get in the way of their narrative/propaganda. Like on election night when all the swing states were red and CNN were reporting it was "too tight to call" and "still in the balance". 😄 That's why nobody listens to them any more.

Much like Harry then.

Let's hope HE goes to a male prison. By the end of HIS sentence, HE will be in a better position to empathize with the girl he visciously raped. Shame on Hallowes for trying to make excuses for this scumbag.

Or maybe Meghan Markle. She has all the traits required for a Democratic nominee. Michelle Obama will fade away once her divorce goes through. Besides, people are bored of the race baiting schtick.

I'm not sure we'd want to join a country that has Hunter Biden running around with a pre-emptive pardon. Besides, the Dems might get back in one day.

Yes, he didn't get a pre-emptive pardon like Biden gave to his crime family.

You think it's a white lie?

The justice system only has itself to blame if people refuse to step in. If a couple of local lads had given him a good shoeing they'd have been labelled racist and probably jailed for a hate crime. As almost happened to Daniel Perry in the US.

Badenoch is 100% right. Yvette Cooper labelled the protesters criminals before they even had a trial. In fact before some were even arrested. https://freespeechunion.org/fsu-writes-to-home-secretary-yvette-cooper-over-prejudicial-criminals-tweet-2/ In contrast, Starmer tried to bury information about the child slayer under the guise of providing a fair trial. 2 Tier Britain under Starmer. Shameful.

Disgustng. He'll be back on the streets in 3-4 years. We really need harsher sentences in the UK for these types of crimes. Instead of releasing serious offenders to make space for social media posters.

Wishful thinking by a leftist publication. The GOP has a wealth of talent. Musk and Vance to name but two. Who does the Democrat party have? An ageing Kamala Harris? Tim Walz? Hunter Biden?

Never saw that coming. 😄 No doubt the dumb bleeding heart Liberals would be screaming about their human rights if we refused them the right to "be reunited with their loved ones". The UK has messed up badly since I left. Could just be a coincidence of course...