JonnyF

Agree. The last year has been horrific for their credibility. Pretending Joe was "sharp as a tack". Then kicking him out because he wasn't. Then choosing DEI Harris. Getting smashed at the election. Then Biden pardoning his crime family after promising not to on the day he left. It will be a long time before they are trusted again.

Finally. My work here is done.

Don't be too harsh, he'll probably serve a couple more years than the social media posters. Although he wasn't arrested, charged and sentenced within a week like they were. Priorities Keir. Priorities.

Or those who think someone who slaughtered 3 young girls with a knife has more right to a fair trial than someone who shouted at a police dog.

Yvette Cooper: "He's a criminal. I'll go on X and tell everyone he's a criminal before he actually goes to trial". "Now everyone shut up about the child slayer. We don't want to prejudice the trial". Sounds legit. 😄 No 2 tier justice there...

Didn't say acting in a criminal manner. Called them criminals. Some were not guilty of a crime and were not even arrested. Didn't mention the child slayer was "acting in a murderous manner either" funnily enough. No No No, we couldn't speak about that.

So they were innocent criminals? 😄

So why didn't they tweet that the child killer was guilty before the trial? He was engaged in murder after all.

And neither should be labelled as guilty by the government until found so in a court of law. In this case, one was, one wasn't. Classic Labour you might say.

But they had not had their day in court. They had not been found guilty. Labour are not the judge, jury and executioner (or at least shouldn't be). It's prejudicial to the trial as you well know.

You also like people being labelled as criminals by the government on social media before they get their day in court. Given your political leanings, hardly surprising.

No it wasn't. A government should not label large groups of people (sone innocent, some not) as criminals before their trial starts. It is prejudicial. You should know that.

Again, my point is they did it with the rioters but not with the child slayer. One rule for one, one rule for another. Just how you like it.

No, my point is they did it with the rioters but not with the child slayer. 2 tier system.

Just as the "Made in Rwanda" killer was engaging in the murder of children. Yet everyone had to stay quiet to ensure a fair trial. Double standards. Some might say "2 Tier justice".

https://www.bbc.com/news/world-us-canada-62688532

It's also not difficult to surmise that someone hacking up small children at a dance class is a horrible violent cowardly scumbag terrorist murderer. It would not have been appropriate for the Home office to tweet that before his trial. But then, this is a 2 Tier system so one gets tweeted while the other gets warnings to stay silent on the matter to avoid prejudicing the trial.

Don't recall seeing your outrage when he was bowing down to the old king and covering up his degenerate son's crimes.

Some did. Some didn't. But how is it fair to label them as criminals, publicly on social media (X) before they had even had a trial? How is that not prejudicial? https://freespeechunion.org/fsu-writes-to-home-secretary-yvette-cooper-over-prejudicial-criminals-tweet-2/ It's one rule for one and one for another. That's why he's called 2 Tier Keir. Badenoch was right to point it out.

Classic Democrat reporting. They never let the truth get in the way of their narrative/propaganda. Like on election night when all the swing states were red and CNN were reporting it was "too tight to call" and "still in the balance". 😄 That's why nobody listens to them any more.

Much like Harry then.

Let's hope HE goes to a male prison. By the end of HIS sentence, HE will be in a better position to empathize with the girl he visciously raped. Shame on Hallowes for trying to make excuses for this scumbag.

Or maybe Meghan Markle. She has all the traits required for a Democratic nominee. Michelle Obama will fade away once her divorce goes through. Besides, people are bored of the race baiting schtick.

I'm not sure we'd want to join a country that has Hunter Biden running around with a pre-emptive pardon. Besides, the Dems might get back in one day.

Yes, he didn't get a pre-emptive pardon like Biden gave to his crime family.