Jump to content

talahtnut

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    3,549
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by talahtnut

  1. 32 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

     

    The Leave campaign were very vocal about their desire to leave the Human Rights Court, anyone using their vote in hope of gaining more freedom might have considered that the court brings a greater level of freedom.

    Yes, 'might be considered' is not a good argument.

    You should know that he UK will still be signed up to

    the ECHR when it leaves the EU. In Britain our human

    rights under the ECHR are protected by the Human

    Rights Act 1998, so no need to panic Sir.

     

     

     

    • Like 2
  2. 17 minutes ago, Kieran00001 said:

     

    Yes, it's true, although I do not see it as being a "soft touch" but as meeting our agreement as parties to the Refugee Convention, also something I call humanity.  

    If you care about our pensioners then you should choose the best for the UK economically, leaving the EU has been shown now to have a bad effect regardless of the deal we get, it is the likes of pensioners who will suffer.

    It is true that Brexit has been shown to have a bad effect.

    It is also true that Brexit has been shown to have a good effect.

    Ignoring the many political deceptions, most people naturally

    seek freedom and independance..and that's what they voted for.

    • Like 1
  3. 13 minutes ago, Grouse said:

    https://www.thetimes.co.uk/edition/news/cabinet-split-over-amber-rudd-s-handling-of-immigration-bill-l9fz78b86

     

    look at the chart showing EU immigration dropping like a stone already (I don't blame people not wanting to a country with a weak currency and so many nasty people). Meanwhile, immigration from non EU countries is rocketing.

     

    I would prefer EU neighbours than African or South and Central Asian ones!

    Discrimination Grouse? 

    • Like 1
  4. 1 hour ago, HAKAPALITA said:

    Im a Grumpy 73 YO Hooligan pretending to be 37 whose ist Range Rover was a 2 Door, hose out puffy faded blue, with a 2$ diff lok switch, then you had Dog Poop brown, or Camo Green. Last one was a Vogue just before Air Ride came out. Im doing a TA now, livin on memories.:sorry: T.A, but the shity choise we have here, no wonder.

    Doing 73 is over the speed limit in UK.    

    Sahara Dust  AKA  Dog Poop Brown.  You would make a good salesman.

  5. 6 minutes ago, transam said:

    You said the Vigo and Fortuner bumpers are not the same..Here are photos of the same year rides with a slight difference in the spotlight  moulding...Now YOU point out where the "fitting" difference is....Go for it...

     

    Toyota_Hilux_3.0_D-4D_Turbo_4x4_2007_(15033561108).thumb.jpg.00f4097110a2c60edfd62d3596830a1e.jpg

     

    fortuner2.jpg.76b8052ff1f9259e8c878248595c6860.jpg

     

     

    I see can varible deffecation her too much, oh deep folly

    follock the nodes..too oblivious

  6. 40 minutes ago, HAKAPALITA said:

    If thats a G Waggon like i had back in 87 for as short a time as poss, if you could engage 1st gear in the morning you had a good one.Range Rover and Land Cruiser were so much better back then, still are in my opinion, bashing any Toyo is pointless, apart from the Tuna   being stupid money  over TAs 4x4, but then my Bms not worth the money either compered to a top Toyo, Honda Accord or Nissan Teana.

    If you couldn't find 1st. gear in the morning, we all know you've

    had too much beer the night before..

    I had the old style Range Rover 1972 with the rubber mats where

    you could hose out the mud, indeed an amazingly good design, I

    really loved it, but in the end, the build quality let me down.

    I've been tempted to get a new one, but they do have problems,

    and the resale value drops dramatically.

    Never tried a Land Cruiser, known as the 'king of the desert',

    brilliant reputation.. but I went for German engineering which

    has served me well for 30 years..Pity its such an ugly machine.

    Talking of Toyota bashing......

     

    • Like 1
  7. 5 minutes ago, Grouse said:

    Get real. This obsession with salaries is a joke. What is the total as a percentage of GDP? Less than a peanut.

    Its not the salaries, that is the tip of the iceberg.  The UK government

    couldn't make a profit out of a jumble sale. Mismanagement and

    waste are the hallmarks of the 30% of the population employed in

    some form of government.

    When a working man earns 1 GBp, he will have appox.10p to call

    his own at the end of the week. 

    The UK government has become an expensive monster.

    Reality check.

  8. 41 minutes ago, ardokano said:

    How about modern farm cart? :))and why need farm cart if you not farmer?;)

     PS in the past I had farm cart, but its be not modern farmer cart with logo Toyota;)

    A new one has a lot of electrical rubbish on it but still does

    the same job as mine..but is about 100.000GBP now.

    Note the bumper bar.

     

    wag.jpg

    • Like 1
  9. 17 minutes ago, tebee said:

    Yes this is exactly the principle of subsidiarity - The EU does not have competence  over pensions, the UK government does. 

    So would you prefer to extend the EU's sphere of influence  if it meant you got a larger, more European type pension ?

    Well thats a good idea, lets stick another tier of government on top

    of our tiers. Who do think is going to pay for that lot?

    In the case of governments, less is more.

     

    • Like 2
×
×
  • Create New...
""