pacovl46

One of the major attractions of Thailand is that it is comparatively cheap. Take that away and they'll go elsewhere. Also, the number of people who are rich is comparatively small and they will NOT be able to make up for the millions of tourists that will move on to other destinations. That pipe dream of being able to replave eegualr tourists with only rich ones will always be just that - a pipe dream!

I didn't mean expulsion from NATO with "needs to get gone"!

Erdoğan is another one, just like Putin and the North Korean guy, that needs to get gone ASAP!!!

Right! Like that's gonna keep them from procuring it elsewhere. Banning, restrictions and illegalization have worked like a charm in the past - not! When will they finally learn that people who want to take drugs WILL find a way to get their hands on some!!!

Me likey likey! ????

Why shouldn't Rottweilers be allowed to be kept???? The number of Rottweilers that attack someone in comparison to the number that are kept is quite small! The problem is NEVER the breed, but irresponsible keepers!

Rottweilers do not have white chest patches and yes, if you raise then properly they're awesome dogs. Used to have one. He loved e erything and everyone except cats.

Well, why do people graduate from coke to crack or from speed to crystal meth? Better kick, I suppose. Having said that, you'd have to build up quite the tolerance to be able to smoke oil because it will kick like a mule. Never got to that level despite having smoked for 23 three years on a daily basis. We started out with hash as well because it's what was around. Then weed became the dominant available commodity and I have to say, I preferred it over hash because hash is too much of a stoner/downer.

Oh, OK, I'll just lap that info up then since it's coming from you, oh delusional one. How about you come back and face the music instead of trying desperately to stay relevant by spreading rubbish?!

They will! I'd be very surprised otherwise.

Oh please! Do you seriously think that the American government isn't capable of getting what they want in a trial like this???

They WILL statue an example! They consider his crime to be high treason and he's gonna get some lengthy time.

In other words they DID make exactly that deal and it just goes to show how ruthless they really are! Having said that, she deserves it and diplomatic immunity should not apply in circumstances like hers to begin with!!!

Because it's legal now and people have been laying in wait for this for decades...

Well, life in prison is probably worse. They're not gonna let him off easy because they need to statue an example!

Dezlez Part of the extradition conditions the UK sets is that he cannot be excecuted! I think it's more a potential repeat of (I did not kill myself) Jeffrey Epstein, while awaiting trial. Let's hope not. I wouldn't be surprised, though, if ge got killed by a "patriot" inmate while in protective custody.

Thanks for clearing that up. It's been awhile since I've read that article.

He doesn't deserve life in prison either but I guess that wasn't part of the "conditions!"

You're asking the wrong question! Any deaths can be directly laid at the hands of those exposed in the leaks. They're actions kickstarted it all.

Well, the way it is now is better than nothing. I'm wondering, too, how long it's gonna last. There's more than enough people who do hashoil extracts and then smoke the oil. It's fairly easy to do, too. Obviously smoking an extract from a plant that has already a high THC content is no joke. I agree, though, it should be legalized unconditional.

Pathetic! If they execute him, his blood will be on the hands of those who made the decision to extradite him!!! His misery will be either way! Unbelievable!!!

It is a well known fact that cannabis consume can cause psychosis in people who have a history of mental disease running in their family. This is precisely why the UK have recategorized cannabis from a class 5 to a class 2 drug about 10 or 12 years ago. I'm not sure, though, if it is still class 5 because obviously a lot has happend in terms of legalization since then globally and I haven't followed up on the situation in the UK. I have this information from an article in the Bangkok Post. Don't nail me on th exact year, though. Having said that, the percentage of people who actually got a psychosis in comparison to the number of pot smokers was something like 0.000000001%. Nonetheless it happened to the brother of a friend of mine. He started to hear voices a few weeks after he took up up spliffing. It went away a few days after he stopped smoking hash and he's been fine ever since.

Initially only growing plants that contain only 0.2% was legalized, which was essentially hemp, which is only good for making paper, ropes and clothes out of it. Then they did away with that and the 0.2% rule now applies only to extracts like hash oil for example. The buds, no matter how high the THC content, are still legal, although they recently put buds back on the list of narcotics, which means smoking in public places is prohibited and is punishable by law, plus pregnant women and people under the age of 20 are prohibited from buying and smoking cannabis products. That's how I understood it.

It is technically possible to die from a THC overdose, but the amount you'd have to consume for that to actually happen is so ginourmous that it's virtually impossible to do that to yourself because you'd pass out long before it came to that!