Jump to content

nauseus

Advanced Member
  • Posts

    16,850
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by nauseus

  1. Much better than the fool you have in the job now.
  2. Dodging facts? So funny. She didn't answer one question with any relevant reply.
  3. Off topic.....deflection...usual cobblers.....this topic is about Harris not Baier or Trump. You all respond like Kamala.
  4. It's criticism and doesn't need explaining more than she didn't answer a single question directly.
  5. The Foxes like a good laugh as much as anyone else!
  6. Interviews involve a series of Q's and A's. She completely failed the interview because she had no A's. Only F's.
  7. Sorry about that. If you like veggies and the missus has a good local fresh market nearby, then maybe the soup machine is the way to go? Then you can input what you like/want and at least know what's in there for sure. Extra herbs and some garlic/ginger will make it more interesting and is better for you if you can handle it. Good luck.
  8. It looks like ever more economic numbers are being fudged than usual for the election build-up. Maybe Donald could keep the 10+ million as "unavailable labor"? At least on paper anyway.
  9. I didn't say that but she admitted that pretty much all her testimony was what she had heard from others, not personally, one way or another. She was not in The Beast with Trump and the Secret Service and this was a "hearing", not a legal trial.
  10. To which claim you added your link, which was more about Hutchinson's flawed hearsay than Trump watching TV. Like the J6 sham committee, you ignore anything that doesn't suit your narrative.
  11. OK then. At least three of you are amused that this so-called "hearing" declined to "hear" some of the most critical evidence from professional law enforcement officers. Says a lot.
  12. Converging out of control so that they crashed? The main reference within your link concerns the testimony of Cassidy Hutchinson, who's "evidence" has long been refuted by the Secret Service. A lot of hearsay with no actual evidence but with connivance from Cheyney. See below. From this link: https://cha.house.gov/2024/10/new-texts-reveal-liz-cheney-communicated-with-cassidy-hutchinson-about-her-select-committee-testimony-without-hutchinson-s-attorney-s-knowledge-despite-cheney-knowing-it-was-unethical Background: During the Select Committee’s sensationalized prime-time hearings, Hutchinson was their surprise, "star witness". Hutchinson testified under oath that she heard that Trump had lunged at the steering wheel of the presidential SUV and engaged in a physical altercation with his lead Secret Service agent after being told they were not going to the Capitol on January 6, 2021. Our Subcommittee's "Initial Findings Report" released in March shows that other White House employees did not corroborate Hutchinson’s dramatic account, and instead directly refuted it. The Select Committee was in possession of these accounts but chose to hide them, and instead promoted Hutchinson’s scandalous narrative.
  13. Not the like the fantasy joke turd piece you just wrote then?

×
×
  • Create New...