Jump to content

nauseus

Advanced Member
 View Profile  See their activity

  • Posts

    17,547

  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    2

 Content Type 

Everything posted by nauseus

  1. nauseus
    You post this and accuse me of poor language skills?
  2. nauseus
    Pending, probable, piffle.
  3. nauseus
    No, I mean selection of the committee itself and other witnesses who might have had a different point of view that were ignored. This was a hearing without any defense allowed.
  4. nauseus
    Selection!!
  5. nauseus
    The selection of the committee and witnesses was biased.
  6. nauseus
    I suppose that's about as detailed as you can manage.
  7. nauseus
    There you go again.
  8. nauseus
    Well you believe wrong ..... but you can get away with quite a lot using bad English language.
  9. nauseus
    Up to you then to detail what this bs is. Carry on.
  10. nauseus
    And all you do is constantly change the subject. On the different subject of Trump's behaviour on J6, then do I think that he should have tried to personally intervene to stop to the rioting and clear the Capitol but that was probably not that easy to do once the breech had been made and there was loud confusion everywhere. BTW using that hopelessly biased J6 Committee testimony won't help your cause.
  11. nauseus
    That's a very sad post. Get well soon.
  12. nauseus
    You can try making it up as you go along but all that does is make you look thicker.
  13. nauseus
    I was responding to an opinion, which I don't agree with. The ignorance is all yours.
  14. nauseus
    What the most important thing "he" said is, is a matter of opinion and, of course, mine is different. "Widely known and supported" is not proof of anything. Your error is in not understanding, then mixing and confusing words. I said that I can't check the text of the book but the third party precis is liable to be erroneous, at the very least. I think we all know Trump et al complained about the 2020 election. What's new?
  15. nauseus
    Most of the people from the Ellipse arrived at the Capitol, later, after the breech. Any convictions of the truly guilty are fine by me. Convictions were for a variety of crimes but very few for actual conspiracy.
  16. nauseus
    Yep. I can't check the text of the book but I can see errors even in this short piece - Trump did not call anyone to violence or criminal activity - that rubbish had already been started by the lunatics at the Capitol before Trump had finished speaking.
  17. nauseus
    Note I did not say anything about prison sentences. I'm sure there's a lot not widely publicized - yet. Who is MAGA?
  18. nauseus
    You obviously have not been paying attention. I made no such claim about effect. The loons at the Capitol could not hear Trump anyway.
  19. nauseus
    They brought megaphones to badger the police into submission. How many guns were found?
  20. nauseus
    If you looked at what Sund said then you just ignored it. Where are your "plenty of facts?
  21. nauseus
    Previous claims suggested that it was planned by Trump. That is different. It wasn't.
  22. nauseus
    So you pasted in two selections from my link? What is your point?
  23. nauseus
    How interesting.
  24. nauseus
    Steven Sund implies that intelligence, with warnings, did exist and were available pre J6 but they were not acted upon. It seems that advance requests for an extra National Guard presence (including from Sund himself) were denied and even calls for extra help were also delayed on the day, after the trouble had already started. https://www.newsweek.com/ex-capitol-police-chief-sounds-alarm-jan-6-cover-1817365
  25. nauseus
    I bet you like awards.

ASEANNOW

ASEANNOW (formerly Thai Visa) Thailand's oldest and most popular forum for expats and foreigners.

Sign up today and have your say

MORE INFO

POPULAR AREAS

CONTACT US

219/59 Asoke Towers, 15th Floor, Soi Sukhumvit 21, Watthana, Bangkok 10110
(+66) 99 196 1100
[email protected]

×
×
  • Create New...