nauseus

But he's going for it anyway? That's dumber than I thought.

These engines are already in use.

Yet another instant deflection back to Trump. Expected but pathetic nonetheless.

If Biden has been so spectacularly successful, how is it that the majority of Americans don't want him back?

Experts are good. A pity they are a rare find within the Biden Brigade.

It probably will be but with a big discount - there is not much choice. It seems that the CHD engine is the Chinese "equivalent" of the originally specified MTU.

Well that's what America and the world needs. It's a shame we'll have to wait for them.

If it were not such a serious issue, I think Joe would be the most entertaining president ever, by far.

Janice Bond?

A self-administered tap with a blow-up rubber Songkran hammer thingy?

Strange I know. To hear them speak you'd think Grassley was the younger.

Haha. Ol' whispering Joe? Shhh...

That is correct.

I like Grassley. Speaks lucidly and well, despite also being falsely smeared by the Democrats. https://www.grassley.senate.gov/news/remarks/grassley-government-abuse-political-treachery-to-quash-congressional-investigation-is-scarier-than-fiction

By this time next year, the majority will vote for anyone but Biden.

I thought he found doing that easy enough before.

Well, you said it.

Another nothing burger.

Joe must be extra confident, especially when 70% of Americans don't want him back. https://www.usatoday.com/story/opinion/columnist/2023/04/25/biden-trump-old-news-president-2024/11727116002/

Any rice, any time.....anywhere. Fancy a Martini with that mate?

My dog can do that.

Happy New Year!

So what is it 1610 or 1850? BS back.

That link plus other previous ones report a lowering of temperatures in many regions on most continents, while these "many parts" of the globe described as "warmer" are nameless or are not identified - probably because they are not obvious - that is because, generally, the world cooled. An increase in temperature and precipitation variability does not necessarily mean an overall increase in temperature, itself.

I read it. Your confuse the issue by introducing solar irradiance in place of sunspot activity, of which the latter was far lower around the MM than today. I have not said that the sun is causing global warming now.