nauseus

I didn't confess anything, that's the fact in this case.

Wrong again! But at least you're consistent.

You're always wrong.

Do you understand why I think that by this question you are being irritatingly patronizing?

The issue is debt, which has grown under red and blue govs.

The fold? Or the fooled?

The first video conveniently has the relevant question cut off. The 2nd one doesn't mention Trump. Boring as ever.

What is dumb is posting this link, which seems to open a different series of off-topic garbage videos each (waste of) time.

Both sides gave had there share. Silly billy.

It is the existing amount of debt that is shameful. If the ceiling is never lowered then how will it ever all be paid back? Or not?

Rubbish as usual.

Surely an upstanding nation like the UK could not even consider rejoining this corrupt EU, now exposed again, with its Panzeris down?

trend of decline.

Of course it is.....just as the labor force participation rate continues its trend of decline. https://tradingeconomics.com/united-states/labor-force-participation-rate

It will be truly amazing if these wonder products of debt truly do benefit the masses and I'm sure that after shaking new leaves off the magic money tree, the Dems won't be cutting any taxes. ????

Money spent on infrastructure will not necessarily benefit everyone. Tax breaks are not part of this latest mad spending, so no need to include them.

This ‘Welfare Queen’ State categorization is too simplistic and does not consider budgets, income inequalities, poverty and unemployment within each state. The recent excessive spending by Democratic regimes involves trillions more dollars not allocated to individual states.

Uncontrolled spending.

Well make your mind up.

That's what I thought. Anyway, it seems there are at least another 1400 similar laws to add to the 2400 previously quoted. This Bill abolishes the principle of supremacy of EU law in UK law, however, elements of (EU) law are expected be retained (restated) as UK law.

Looks like most of those red things got lost on Pattaya Nua instead? But my memory is not what it was!

So what is the solution then?

The reality of this 'system' is that a majority bloc of countries, allied by similar interests, hold the most influence in the EU Commission as well as the Council, plus a rather regular overall voting majority in the parliament. That is how the EU is and how it has always been.

As is your eagerness to ignore the biggest giveaway of Parliamentary sovereignty ever. Bye.

So you'd rather take another 20 years going through all these 2,400 items and having a vote one-by-one? Like I said, the bill is in process and has to pass through UK parliament first. It looks like the UK has far more important worries to deal with right now. This bill actually does demonstrate recent freedom from the EU and regained sovereignty. It is much less far-reaching than the European Communities Act of 1972, just another single bill, only passed weakly at the 3rd attempt but which allowed the simultaneous importation into the UK of thousands of EEC laws, rules, commitments and regulations in 1973, when we joined, without a having a referendum first. Major elements of national sovereignty were lost, with no further voting on it by parliament. Much bigger apples.