nauseus

A true Frenchman would know it's spelt rosbif.

From all the reports included in the link below, it looks like the Russians still occupy 50-70% of Severodonetsk. Maybe the Orcs lost concentration while they were blowing up wooden monasteries, with women and children inside? In the key city of Severodonetsk, Ukraine says it has recaptured part of the territory that was lost to Russian forces. https://www.bbc.com/news/live/world-europe-61656289

Gosh!

Ducatis don't so that! ????

Nah. They don't need a lead. DIY/lol

Exactly.

Higher IQ ..... definetely.....lol

You linked an allegation but there was no proof. There are conspiracy stories, as ever, but none conclusively prove collusion, which is a word used rather carelessly here. Whitlam led a government that was effectively powerless, so Australia was rudderless until Whitlam went, which he wouldn't do voluntarily.

You mentioned the palace, not me.

I suppose as head of state, HM is entitled to be kept in the loop.

Collusion now? Better clean yer boots.

But I thought they wanted privacy? Apart from the Netflix exposure, that is. ????

Native people? OMG.

Cesspool more like. A new line of whiners. At least they won't qualify as future monarchs.

Says the arsonist.

Send it all to the UK you mean? Very generous of ya matey!

So it's OK to bring Trump in when it suits you?? I really don't think RT is the most dangerous weapon in the Russian propaganda arsenal. Do you?

It was Jingthing who brought his name into it and you also used it.

Irrelevant.

None of your links cover the issue. Covid, 5G and wiki generalizations are nothing to do with Trump.

Well, although you don't prove it, I'm sure that is probably true. However, I'm also sure that the Russians are far from being the only ones guilty of this kind of thing, be it from outside or inside the "west".

On the question of obstruction only - not collusion.

It doesn't mean they did, either. Maybe they just like interfering? But the important thing is that Trump did not collude or seek favour from Russia in 2016. He won but how did that benefit Russia? Really? If you want to refer to divisive politics then better take look at Biden, who, after touting "unity" in his inaugural address, now sees the USA more divided than ever and after a series of disasters, like Afghanistan and the Southern border, has earned a 56% rating of disapproval (and this has been one of hid better weeks). https://www.rasmussenreports.com/public_content/politics/biden_administration/biden_approval_index_history

They have as far as Trump's alleged collusion with Russia is concerned. Now it seems more likely that if there were any shenanigans going on in 2016 then it was Hillary who was particularly active. We shall see. https://www.americanbar.org/news/abanews/aba-news-archives/2019/03/mueller-concludes-investigation/ https://www.bloomberg.com/news/articles/2022-05-20/clinton-approved-trump-russia-leak-her-campaign-manager-says

No. Not now, This is from 2018 but the allegations of Russian manipulation of the American electorate in this weak piece of propaganda have already been disproved - so the rest is just as likely to be nonsense too.