nauseus

You look to be bored. Here's some light viewing: It might clear things up a bit.

Swalwell. What a joke.

I imagine you are.

I don't think Tulsi Gabbard is a cause for concern but, by the trash that you post, I think you are.

Aw come on! Biden wasn't that bad.

Not likely but probably the best case possible. The BMD system is designed for defence, only.

It was bloody awful. That discussion would be better had off-media. The room was full of press and who else? I'm not sure. Trump should have set this up differently but Pres. Z should be a bit smarter if he wants significant help from the USA because that's the only way he will end up with any kind of beneficial result. Previous invasions of this scale in Europe have usually required major wars to determine the outcome but I can't see the US (or EU) being willing to go that far. I hope that they can all at least talk about it again after this mess - the alternative is complete disaster.

Pot calling...line 3.

Pot calling on line 2.

Do have some coffee.

I have nice coffee this morning - you should try some - or at least wake up and smell it.

The Chinese have no need of more raw erfs - they have heaps - literally.

Imagine. 555

A known Putin boot licker? Just because Horrible Hillary said so?

I knew you couldn't.

You didn't answer my question. Your condescension and diversion over to the EU is just another way of deflection. Typical. Support to continue fighting is exactly what it says on the tin and that means war might continue until there are no Ukrainian men left alive. That might suit Putin but it would be the absolute end of Ukraine. But support to find a solution to stop fighting is what Trump wants to give - this is something that nobody has seriously offered yet - after 3 years help is needed. It seems that Trump is talking to the Russians first to try to formulate an agreement that both sides might at least consider and then let the Ukrainians take a look at it. This is better than no peace effort at all. If Ukraine (or Putin) is not happy enough, then they won't agree. Few details have been released, probably because this process has only just started. But what is there to lose that is not at risk already??

So when was that going to happen?

Yawn.

Yes, certain sectors have been sliding for a while and the important unemployment rate is back up to 7.5%. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/U6RATE And because Trump is keen to cut out all of those recently created do-nothing gov jobs that's a problem? Righty ho!

What you don't understand is that this goes back way further than Covid. Second, do tax cuts necessarily produce inflation?

Such ridiculously high amounts of money creation will make the markets and economy appear to be wonderful. https://fred.stlouisfed.org/series/M2SL All coming to an end now, maybe, finally?

So, who, after three full years, is going to stop it? Any bids?

Be careful what you wish for.

Er... so there was no invasion then?